These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26614127)

  • 1. MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies.
    Mikheenko A; Saveliev V; Gurevich A
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(7):1088-90. PubMed ID: 26614127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies.
    Gurevich A; Saveliev V; Vyahhi N; Tesler G
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(8):1072-5. PubMed ID: 23422339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Icarus: visualizer for de novo assembly evaluation.
    Mikheenko A; Valin G; Prjibelski A; Saveliev V; Gurevich A
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 32(21):3321-3323. PubMed ID: 27378299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. rnaQUAST: a quality assessment tool for de novo transcriptome assemblies.
    Bushmanova E; Antipov D; Lapidus A; Suvorov V; Prjibelski AD
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 32(14):2210-2. PubMed ID: 27153654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metaviral SPAdes: assembly of viruses from metagenomic data.
    Antipov D; Raiko M; Lapidus A; Pevzner PA
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 36(14):4126-4129. PubMed ID: 32413137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DeepMAsED: evaluating the quality of metagenomic assemblies.
    Mineeva O; Rojas-Carulla M; Ley RE; Schölkopf B; Youngblut ND
    Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(10):3011-3017. PubMed ID: 32096824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GraphBin: refined binning of metagenomic contigs using assembly graphs.
    Mallawaarachchi V; Wickramarachchi A; Lin Y
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3307-3313. PubMed ID: 32167528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A scalable assembly-free variable selection algorithm for biomarker discovery from metagenomes.
    Gkanogiannis A; Gazut S; Salanoubat M; Kanj S; Brüls T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):311. PubMed ID: 27542753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MetaVelvet-SL: an extension of the Velvet assembler to a de novo metagenomic assembler utilizing supervised learning.
    Afiahayati ; Sato K; Sakakibara Y
    DNA Res; 2015 Feb; 22(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 25431440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MeCorS: Metagenome-enabled error correction of single cell sequencing reads.
    Bremges A; Singer E; Woyke T; Sczyrba A
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 32(14):2199-201. PubMed ID: 27153586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Capturing variation in metagenomic assembly graphs with MetaCortex.
    Martin S; Ayling M; Patrono L; Caccamo M; Murcia P; Leggett RM
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36722204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Targeted domain assembly for fast functional profiling of metagenomic datasets with S3A.
    David L; Vicedomini R; Richard H; Carbone A
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(13):3975-3981. PubMed ID: 32330240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets.
    Wu YW; Simmons BA; Singer SW
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):605-7. PubMed ID: 26515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MetaCAA: A clustering-aided methodology for efficient assembly of metagenomic datasets.
    Reddy RM; Mohammed MH; Mande SS
    Genomics; 2014; 103(2-3):161-8. PubMed ID: 24607570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ALE: a generic assembly likelihood evaluation framework for assessing the accuracy of genome and metagenome assemblies.
    Clark SC; Egan R; Frazier PI; Wang Z
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 23303509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BIGMAC : breaking inaccurate genomes and merging assembled contigs for long read metagenomic assembly.
    Lam KK; Hall R; Clum A; Rao S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):435. PubMed ID: 27793084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved assemblies using a source-agnostic pipeline for MetaGenomic Assembly by Merging (MeGAMerge) of contigs.
    Scholz M; Lo CC; Chain PS
    Sci Rep; 2014 Oct; 4():6480. PubMed ID: 25270300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.
    Herath D; Tang SL; Tandon K; Ackland D; Halgamuge SK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):571. PubMed ID: 29297295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. coronaSPAdes: from biosynthetic gene clusters to RNA viral assemblies.
    Meleshko D; Hajirasouliha I; Korobeynikov A
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 34406356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.