These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26614310)

  • 1. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Guidelines on the use of X-STRs in kinship analysis.
    Tillmar AO; Kling D; Butler JM; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Egeland T; Gusmão L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():269-275. PubMed ID: 28544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The forensic value of X-linked markers in mixed-male DNA analysis.
    He H; Zha L; Cai J; Huang J
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Sep; 132(5):1281-1285. PubMed ID: 29728767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
    Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FamLinkX - implementation of a general model for likelihood computations for X-chromosomal marker data.
    Kling D; Dell'Amico B; Tillmar AO
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():1-7. PubMed ID: 25771099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general method to assess the utility of the X-chromosomal markers in kinship testing.
    Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 21592877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using X-chromosomal markers in relationship testing: calculation of likelihood ratios taking both linkage and linkage disequilibrium into account.
    Tillmar AO; Egeland T; Lindblom B; Holmlund G; Mostad P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 21167800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general model for likelihood computations of genetic marker data accounting for linkage, linkage disequilibrium, and mutations.
    Kling D; Tillmar A; Egeland T; Mostad P
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Sep; 129(5):943-54. PubMed ID: 25425094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linkage and linkage disequilibrium among the markers in the forensic MPS panels.
    Li R; Budowle B; Sun H; Ge J
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1637-1646. PubMed ID: 33885147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of linkage between vWA and D12S391 in kinship analysis.
    O'Connor KL; Tillmar AO
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):840-4. PubMed ID: 22542849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of linkage and linkage disequilibrium for eight X-STR markers.
    Tillmar AO; Mostad P; Egeland T; Lindblom B; Holmlund G; Montelius K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Dec; 3(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19083865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 20457080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the effects of genetic linkage when using a combination of STR and SNP loci for kinship testing.
    Yang D; Ma SX; Zhao GL; Gao A; Xu ZK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 Jul; 69():102441. PubMed ID: 38599008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
    Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis of X-STRs in Italian families.
    Inturri S; Menegon S; Amoroso A; Torre C; Robino C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Mar; 5(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 21087904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
    Egeland T; Sheehan N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes.
    Szibor R; Krawczak M; Hering S; Edelmann J; Kuhlisch E; Krause D
    Int J Legal Med; 2003 Apr; 117(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 12690502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the use of dense SNP marker data for the identification of distant relative pairs.
    Sun M; Jobling MA; Taliun D; Pramstaller PP; Egeland T; Sheehan NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():14-25. PubMed ID: 26474828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.
    Egeland T; Slooten K
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 27519910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects.
    Kling D; Welander J; Tillmar A; Skare O; Egeland T; Holmlund G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21813350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.