These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26615396)

  • 1. Different mechanisms of resistance modulate sulfite tolerance in wine yeasts.
    Nadai C; Treu L; Campanaro S; Giacomini A; Corich V
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jan; 100(2):797-813. PubMed ID: 26615396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sulfur and adenine metabolisms are linked, and both modulate sulfite resistance in wine yeast.
    Aranda A; Jiménez-Martí E; Orozco H; Matallana E; Del Olmo M
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 Aug; 54(16):5839-46. PubMed ID: 16881685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3.
    Varela C; Bartel C; Roach M; Borneman A; Curtin C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 85(4):. PubMed ID: 30552183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection and validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR studies during Saccharomyces cerevisiae alcoholic fermentation in the presence of sulfite.
    Nadai C; Campanaro S; Giacomini A; Corich V
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 215():49-56. PubMed ID: 26325600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new chromosomal rearrangement improves the adaptation of wine yeasts to sulfite.
    García-Ríos E; Nuévalos M; Barrio E; Puig S; Guillamón JM
    Environ Microbiol; 2019 May; 21(5):1771-1781. PubMed ID: 30859719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of new Saccharomyces cerevisiae variants of the MET2 and SKP2 genes controlling the sulfur assimilation pathway and the production of undesirable sulfur compounds during alcoholic fermentation.
    Noble J; Sanchez I; Blondin B
    Microb Cell Fact; 2015 May; 14():68. PubMed ID: 25947166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of CUP1 gene copy-number and XVI-VIII/XV-XVI translocations on copper and sulfite tolerance in vineyard Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain populations.
    Crosato G; Nadai C; Carlot M; Garavaglia J; Ziegler DR; Rossi RC; De Castilhos J; Campanaro S; Treu L; Giacomini A; Corich V
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2020 Jun; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32436567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sulfur dioxide addition at crush alters Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain composition in spontaneous fermentations at two Canadian wineries.
    Morgan SC; Scholl CM; Benson NL; Stone ML; Durall DM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 244():96-102. PubMed ID: 28086153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Yeast multistress resistance and lag-phase characterisation during wine fermentation.
    Ferreira D; Galeote V; Sanchez I; Legras JL; Ortiz-Julien A; Dequin S
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2017 Sep; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28817926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from must of grape grown in experimental vineyard.
    Cappello MS; Bleve G; Grieco F; Dellaglio F; Zacheo G
    J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(6):1274-80. PubMed ID: 15546418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular and physiological characteristics of a grape yeast strain containing atypical genetic material.
    Cappello MS; Poltronieri P; Blaiotta G; Zacheo G
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Nov; 144(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20880601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution-based strategy to generate non-genetically modified organisms Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains impaired in sulfate assimilation pathway.
    De Vero L; Solieri L; Giudici P
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 53(5):572-5. PubMed ID: 21883319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enological characterization of Spanish Saccharomyces kudriavzevii strains, one of the closest relatives to parental strains of winemaking and brewing Saccharomyces cerevisiae × S. kudriavzevii hybrids.
    Peris D; Pérez-Través L; Belloch C; Querol A
    Food Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 53(Pt B):31-40. PubMed ID: 26678127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Copper-based grape pest management has impacted wine aroma.
    De Guidi I; Galeote V; Blondin B; Legras JL
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10124. PubMed ID: 38698114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sulfate transport mutants affect hydrogen sulfide and sulfite production during alcoholic fermentation.
    Walker ME; Zhang J; Sumby KM; Lee A; Houlès A; Li S; Jiranek V
    Yeast; 2021 Jun; 38(6):367-381. PubMed ID: 33560525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel wine yeast with mutations in YAP1 that produce less acetic acid during fermentation.
    Cordente AG; Cordero-Bueso G; Pretorius IS; Curtin CD
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2013 Feb; 13(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 23146134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical cell-cell contact elicits specific transcriptomic responses in wine yeast species.
    Luyt NA; de Witt RN; Divol B; Patterton HG; Setati ME; Taillandier P; Bauer FF
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Aug; 12(8):e0057223. PubMed ID: 39012115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of
    Schmidt SA; Kolouchova R; Forgan AH; Borneman AR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Feb; 10(2):591-603. PubMed ID: 31792006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates with extreme hydrogen sulfide production showed different oxidative stress resistances responses during wine fermentation by RNA sequencing analysis.
    Li Y; Zhang Y; Liu M; Qin Y; Liu Y
    Food Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 79():147-155. PubMed ID: 30621870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of SSU1 multi-copy expression on Saccharomyces cerevisiae sulphite production].
    Chen Y; Shen S; Wang Y; Xiao D
    Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2008 Dec; 48(12):1609-15. PubMed ID: 19271535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.