These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26615702)

  • 1. Ligand Affinities Estimated by Quantum Chemical Calculations.
    Söderhjelm P; Kongsted J; Ryde U
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2010 May; 6(5):1726-37. PubMed ID: 26615702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculation of protein-ligand interaction energies by a fragmentation approach combining high-level quantum chemistry with classical many-body effects.
    Söderhjelm P; Aquilante F; Ryde U
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Aug; 113(32):11085-94. PubMed ID: 19618955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of ligand-binding affinities supported by quantum mechanical methods.
    Söderhjelm P; Kongsted J; Genheden S; Ryde U
    Interdiscip Sci; 2010 Mar; 2(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 20640794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How accurate can a force field become? A polarizable multipole model combined with fragment-wise quantum-mechanical calculations.
    Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Phys Chem A; 2009 Jan; 113(3):617-27. PubMed ID: 19093829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A semiempirical approach to ligand-binding affinities: dependence on the Hamiltonian and corrections.
    Mikulskis P; Genheden S; Wichmann K; Ryde U
    J Comput Chem; 2012 May; 33(12):1179-89. PubMed ID: 22396176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binding affinities by alchemical perturbation using QM/MM with a large QM system and polarizable MM model.
    Genheden S; Ryde U; Söderhjelm P
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Oct; 36(28):2114-24. PubMed ID: 26280564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
    Genheden S; Ryde U
    Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.
    Genheden S; Mikulskis P; Hu L; Kongsted J; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):13081-92. PubMed ID: 21728337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarking quantum chemical methods for the calculation of molecular dipole moments and polarizabilities.
    Hickey AL; Rowley CN
    J Phys Chem A; 2014 May; 118(20):3678-87. PubMed ID: 24796376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conformational dependence of charges in protein simulations.
    Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(5):750-60. PubMed ID: 18773405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Solvent effects on global reactivity properties for neutral and charged systems using the sequential Monte Carlo quantum mechanics model.
    Jaramillo P; Pérez P; Fuentealba P; Canuto S; Coutinho K
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Apr; 113(13):4314-22. PubMed ID: 19320524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of polarizable continuum model and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics solute electronic polarization: study of the optical and magnetic properties of diazines in water.
    Manzoni V; Lyra ML; Coutinho K; Canuto S
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(14):144103. PubMed ID: 22010694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Density-Dependent Formulation of Dispersion-Repulsion Interactions in Hybrid Multiscale Quantum/Molecular Mechanics (QM/MM) Models.
    Curutchet C; Cupellini L; Kongsted J; Corni S; Frediani L; Steindal AH; Guido CA; Scalmani G; Mennucci B
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Mar; 14(3):1671-1681. PubMed ID: 29439575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative complexation energies for Li(+) ion in solution: molecular level solvation versus polarizable continuum model study.
    Eilmes A; Kubisiak P
    J Phys Chem A; 2010 Jan; 114(2):973-9. PubMed ID: 20030307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics modeling of photoelectron spectra: the carbon 1s core-electron binding energies of ethanol-water solutions.
    Löytynoja T; Niskanen J; Jänkälä K; Vahtras O; Rinkevicius Z; Ågren H
    J Phys Chem B; 2014 Nov; 118(46):13217-25. PubMed ID: 25340948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Implicit and Explicit Polarizable Solvation Models for Nuclear-Electronic Orbital Systems: Quantum Proton Polarization and Solvation Energetics.
    Lambros E; Link B; Chow M; Lipparini F; Hammes-Schiffer S; Li X
    J Phys Chem A; 2023 Nov; 127(44):9322-9333. PubMed ID: 37889479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions.
    Marenich AV; Cramer CJ; Truhlar DG
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 May; 113(18):6378-96. PubMed ID: 19366259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Solvation effects on alanine dipeptide: A MP2/cc-pVTZ//MP2/6-31G** study of (Phi, Psi) energy maps and conformers in the gas phase, ether, and water.
    Wang ZX; Duan Y
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Nov; 25(14):1699-716. PubMed ID: 15362127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication: Quantum polarized fluctuating charge model: a practical method to include ligand polarizability in biomolecular simulations.
    Kimura SR; Rajamani R; Langley DR
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Dec; 135(23):231101. PubMed ID: 22191857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Use of Anisotropic Potentials in Modeling Water and Free Energies of Hydration.
    Karamertzanis PG; Raiteri P; Galindo A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2010 May; 6(5):1590-607. PubMed ID: 26615693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.