These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26616228)

  • 1. Does a pay-for-performance program for primary care physicians alleviate health inequity in childhood vaccination rates?
    Katz A; Enns JE; Chateau D; Lix L; Jutte D; Edwards J; Brownell M; Metge C; Nickel N; Taylor C; Burland E;
    Int J Equity Health; 2015 Nov; 14():114. PubMed ID: 26616228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do physician organizations located in lower socioeconomic status areas score lower on pay-for-performance measures?
    Chien AT; Wroblewski K; Damberg C; Williams TR; Yanagihara D; Yakunina Y; Casalino LP
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 May; 27(5):548-54. PubMed ID: 22160817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating a Pay-for-Performance Program for Medicaid Children in an Accountable Care Organization.
    Gleeson S; Kelleher K; Gardner W
    JAMA Pediatr; 2016 Mar; 170(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 26810378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of a PPO pay-for-performance program on patients with diabetes.
    Chen JY; Tian H; Taira Juarez D; Hodges KA; Brand JC; Chung RS; Legorreta AP
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Jan; 16(1):e11-9. PubMed ID: 20059287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicaid Pay for Performance Programs and Childhood Immunization Status.
    Hu T; Decker SL; Chou SY
    Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5 Suppl 1):S51-S57. PubMed ID: 27102859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of a pay-for-performance program on low performing physicians.
    Chen JY; Kang N; Juarez DT; Hodges KA; Chung RS; Legorreta AP
    J Healthc Qual; 2010; 32(1):13-21; quiz 21-2. PubMed ID: 20151587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inequities in ambulatory care and the relationship between socioeconomic status and respiratory hospitalizations: a population-based study of a canadian city.
    Trachtenberg AJ; Dik N; Chateau D; Katz A
    Ann Fam Med; 2014; 12(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 25354403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of pay-for-performance on the quality of care in ophthalmology: Empirical evidence from Germany.
    Herbst T; Foerster J; Emmert M
    Health Policy; 2018 Jun; 122(6):667-673. PubMed ID: 29606288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of diabetes pay-for-performance incentive designs.
    Hsieh HM; Tsai SL; Shin SJ; Mau LW; Chiu HC
    Med Care; 2015 Feb; 53(2):106-15. PubMed ID: 25397966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving health systems performance in low- and middle-income countries: a system dynamics model of the pay-for-performance initiative in Afghanistan.
    Alonge O; Lin S; Igusa T; Peters DH
    Health Policy Plan; 2017 Dec; 32(10):1417-1426. PubMed ID: 29029075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Would German physicians opt for pay-for-performance programs? A willingness-to-accept experiment in a large general practitioners' sample.
    Krauth C; Liersch S; Jensen S; Amelung VE
    Health Policy; 2016 Feb; 120(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 26852868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The association between participation in a pay-for-performance program and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based cohort study.
    Hsieh HM; Lin TH; Lee IC; Huang CJ; Shin SJ; Chiu HC
    Prev Med; 2016 Apr; 85():53-59. PubMed ID: 26740347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using financial incentives to improve the care of tuberculosis patients.
    Lee CY; Chi MJ; Yang SL; Lo HY; Cheng SH
    Am J Manag Care; 2015 Jan; 21(1):e35-42. PubMed ID: 25880266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of welfare systems on pay-for-performance programs for general practitioners: A critical review.
    Ammi M; Fortier G
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 178():157-166. PubMed ID: 28226301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors related to continuing care and interruption of P4P program participation in patients with diabetes.
    Yen SM; Kung PT; Sheen YJ; Chiu LT; Xu XC; Tsai WC
    Am J Manag Care; 2016 Jan; 22(1):e18-30. PubMed ID: 26799201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disease-specific Pay-for-Performance Programs: Do the P4P Effects Differ Between Diabetic Patients With and Without Multiple Chronic Conditions?
    Huang YC; Lee MC; Chou YJ; Huang N
    Med Care; 2016 Nov; 54(11):977-983. PubMed ID: 27547944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician response to pay-for-performance: evidence from a natural experiment.
    Li J; Hurley J; DeCicca P; Buckley G
    Health Econ; 2014 Aug; 23(8):962-78. PubMed ID: 23861240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can opportunities be enhanced for vaccinating children in home visiting programs? A population-based cohort study.
    Isaac MR; Chartier M; Brownell M; Chateau D; Nickel NC; Martens P; Katz A; Sarkar J; Hu M; Burland E; Goh C; Taylor C;
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Jul; 15():620. PubMed ID: 26149681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gendered effects of pay for performance among family physicians for chronic disease care: an economic evaluation in a context of universal health coverage.
    Gupta N; Lavallée R; Ayles J
    Hum Resour Health; 2019 May; 17(1):40. PubMed ID: 31151400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-time Feedback in Pay-for-Performance: Does More Information Lead to Improvement?
    Bond AM; Volpp KG; Emanuel EJ; Caldarella K; Hodlofski A; Sacks L; Patel P; Sokol K; Vittore S; Calgano D; Nelson C; Weng K; Troxel A; Navathe A
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1737-1743. PubMed ID: 31041590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.