151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26617242)
1. Influence of Guided Waves in Tibia on Non-linear Scattering of Contrast Agents.
Wang D; Zhong H; Zhai Y; Hu H; Jin B; Wan M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):561-73. PubMed ID: 26617242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of guided waves in bone on pulse-inversion contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Wang D; Zhang X; Sang Y; Qu Z; Su Q; Zhao J; Wan M
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 31145816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound triggered cell death in vitro with doxorubicin loaded poly lactic-acid contrast agents.
Eisenbrey JR; Huang P; Hsu J; Wheatley MA
Ultrasonics; 2009 Dec; 49(8):628-33. PubMed ID: 19394992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of binding on the subharmonic emissions from individual lipid-encapsulated microbubbles at transmit frequencies of 11 and 25 MHz.
Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 39(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 23219039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification and analysis of multimode guided waves in tibia cortical bone.
Ta DA; Huang K; Wang WQ; Wang YY; Le LH
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e279-84. PubMed ID: 16846626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-linear response and viscoelastic properties of lipid-coated microbubbles: DSPC versus DPPC.
van Rooij T; Luan Y; Renaud G; van der Steen AF; Versluis M; de Jong N; Kooiman K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 May; 41(5):1432-45. PubMed ID: 25724308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-frequency dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents.
Sun Y; Kruse DE; Dayton PA; Ferrara KW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1981-91. PubMed ID: 16422410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An iterative fullwave simulation approach to multiple scattering in media with randomly distributed microbubbles.
Joshi A; Lindsey BD; Dayton PA; Pinton G; Muller M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4202-4217. PubMed ID: 28266925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced heat deposition using ultrasound contrast agent--modeling and experimental observations.
Razansky D; Einziger PD; Adam DR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 16471440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Streaming flow from ultrasound contrast agents by acoustic waves in a blood vessel model.
Cho E; Chung SK; Rhee K
Ultrasonics; 2015 Sep; 62():66-74. PubMed ID: 26025507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of guided ultrasound wave propagation in intact and healing long bones.
Protopappas VC; Kourtis IC; Kourtis LC; Malizos KN; Massalas CV; Fotiadis DI
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3907-21. PubMed ID: 17552737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal dosage of ultrasound contrast agent for ultrasound surgery: thermal effect of linear plane wave.
Seo J
Ultrasonics; 2009 Jun; 49(6-7):565-8. PubMed ID: 19345389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging ultrasonic dispersive guided wave energy in long bones using linear radon transform.
Tran TN; Nguyen KC; Sacchi MD; Le LH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 40(11):2715-27. PubMed ID: 25282483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.
Shekhar H; Rychak JJ; Doyley MM
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082903. PubMed ID: 23927358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of self-demodulation on the subharmonic response of contrast agent microbubbles.
Daeichin V; Faez T; Renaud G; Bosch JG; van der Steen AF; de Jong N
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3675-91. PubMed ID: 22614693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of dose distribution of molecular delivery after blood-brain barrier disruption by focused ultrasound with treatment planning.
Yang FY; Chen CC; Kao YH; Chen CL; Ko CE; Horng SC; Chen RC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):620-7. PubMed ID: 23384461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Theoretical and experimental characterisation of magnetic microbubbles.
Mulvana H; Eckersley RJ; Tang MX; Pankhurst Q; Stride E
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 May; 38(5):864-75. PubMed ID: 22480944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In Vitro Investigation of the Individual Contributions of Ultrasound-Induced Stable and Inertial Cavitation in Targeted Drug Delivery.
Gourevich D; Volovick A; Dogadkin O; Wang L; Mulvana H; Medan Y; Melzer A; Cochran S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1853-64. PubMed ID: 25887690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]