These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26618039)

  • 1. Are Currently Available Wearable Devices for Activity Tracking and Heart Rate Monitoring Accurate, Precise, and Medically Beneficial?
    El-Amrawy F; Nounou MI
    Healthc Inform Res; 2015 Oct; 21(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 26618039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the Validity of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Fitness Tracking Under Various Physical Activities: Comparative Study.
    Xie J; Wen D; Liang L; Jia Y; Gao L; Lei J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e94. PubMed ID: 29650506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of wearable fitness devices.
    Kaewkannate K; Kim S
    BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():433. PubMed ID: 27220855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usability Study of Mainstream Wearable Fitness Devices: Feature Analysis and System Usability Scale Evaluation.
    Liang J; Xian D; Liu X; Fu J; Zhang X; Tang B; Lei J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Nov; 6(11):e11066. PubMed ID: 30409767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
    Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Activity Trackers in Parkinson Disease: Should We Prescribe Them?
    Wendel N; Macpherson CE; Webber K; Hendron K; DeAngelis T; Colon-Semenza C; Ellis T
    Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 98(8):705-714. PubMed ID: 29718452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
    Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobile Device Accuracy for Step Counting Across Age Groups.
    Modave F; Guo Y; Bian J; Gurka MJ; Parish A; Smith MD; Lee AM; Buford TW
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Jun; 5(6):e88. PubMed ID: 28659255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort.
    Shcherbina A; Mattsson CM; Waggott D; Salisbury H; Christle JW; Hastie T; Wheeler MT; Ashley EA
    J Pers Med; 2017 May; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 28538708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavior Change Techniques Present in Wearable Activity Trackers: A Critical Analysis.
    Mercer K; Li M; Giangregorio L; Burns C; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Apr; 4(2):e40. PubMed ID: 27122452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables.
    Henriksen A; Haugen Mikalsen M; Woldaregay AZ; Muzny M; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock LA; Grimsgaard S
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e110. PubMed ID: 29567635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of Xiaomi Mi Band 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 to measure step count and distance for physical activity and healthcare in adults over 65 years.
    Pino-Ortega J; Gómez-Carmona CD; Rico-González M
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jun; 87():6-10. PubMed ID: 33866152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities.
    Alinia P; Cain C; Fallahzadeh R; Shahrokni A; Cook D; Ghasemzadeh H
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Aug; 5(8):e106. PubMed ID: 28801304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. User Acceptance of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Method Study.
    Puri A; Kim B; Nguyen O; Stolee P; Tung J; Lee J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Nov; 5(11):e173. PubMed ID: 29141837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
    An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and Reliability Evaluation of Four Commercial Activity Trackers' Step Counting Performance.
    Tophøj KH; Petersen MG; Sæbye C; Baad-Hansen T; Wagner S
    Telemed J E Health; 2018 Sep; 24(9):669-677. PubMed ID: 29303680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults.
    Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216891. PubMed ID: 31112585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the Xiaomi Mi Band 4 an Accuracy Tool for Measuring Health-Related Parameters in Adults and Older People? An Original Validation Study.
    de la Casa Pérez A; Latorre Román PÁ; Muñoz Jiménez M; Lucena Zurita M; Laredo Aguilera JA; Párraga Montilla JA; Cabrera Linares JC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived user preferences and usability evaluation of mainstream wearable devices for health monitoring.
    Jia Y; Wang W; Wen D; Liang L; Gao L; Lei J
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5350. PubMed ID: 30065893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.
    Nelson BW; Allen NB
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e10828. PubMed ID: 30855232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.