These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26618152)

  • 1. A Study of Stakeholder Views to Shape a Communication Strategy for GMO in Brazil.
    Capalbo DM; Arantes OM; Maia AG; Borges IC; da Silveira JM
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():179. PubMed ID: 26618152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information.
    Wunderlich S; Gatto KA
    Adv Nutr; 2015 Nov; 6(6):842-51. PubMed ID: 26567205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Awareness of GMOs in terms of the Iran biosafety act: A case study of Tehran city.
    Shooshtari A; Hajatpour Z; Ghaffari MR; Seraji F; Loni F
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e25487. PubMed ID: 38352779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Belgian dietitians' knowledge, perceptions and willingness-to-recommend of genetically modified food and organisms.
    De Mesmaeker M; Tran D; Verbeecke V; Ameye F; Dubaere P; Strobbe S; Van Der Straeten D; De Steur H
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2024 Feb; 37(1):142-154. PubMed ID: 37751474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths. Stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public?
    Marris C
    EMBO Rep; 2001 Jul; 2(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 11463731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust.
    Frewer LJ; Scholderer J; Bredahl L
    Risk Anal; 2003 Dec; 23(6):1117-33. PubMed ID: 14641888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health.
    Yang YT; Chen B
    J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Apr; 96(6):1851-5. PubMed ID: 26536836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudes of the Ecuadorian University Community Toward Genetically Modified Organisms.
    Román Collazo C; Chacha Guerrero K; Loja Mejia T; Andrade Campoverde D; Hernández Rodriguez Y
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():801891. PubMed ID: 35252162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are Market GM Plants an Unrecognized Platform for Bioterrorism and Biocrime?
    Mueller S
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():121. PubMed ID: 31192204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GM crops and foods: what do consumers want to know?
    McHughen A
    GM Crops Food; 2013; 4(3):172-82. PubMed ID: 24051491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.
    Varzakas TH; Chryssochoidis G; Argyropoulos D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 17275157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is it only the regulatory status? Broadening the debate on cisgenic plants.
    van Hove L; Gillund F
    Environ Sci Eur; 2017; 29(1):22. PubMed ID: 28680789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
    Haslberger AG
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetically modified organisms: do the benefits outweigh the risks?
    Hug K
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 18344661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The state of the 'GMO' debate - toward an increasingly favorable and less polarized media conversation on ag-biotech?
    Evanega S; Conrow J; Adams J; Lynas M
    GM Crops Food; 2022 Dec; 13(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 35318886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The EU regulatory framework on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
    Bruetschy C
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):169-174. PubMed ID: 31321701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knowlege of, attitudes toward, and acceptance of genetically modified organisms among prospective teachers of biology, home economics, and grade school in Slovenia.
    Sorgo A; Ambrožič-Dolinšek J
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2010 May; 38(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 21567816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward a workable biosafety system for regulating genetically modified organisms in Ethiopia: balancing conservation and competitiveness.
    Abraham A
    GM Crops Food; 2013; 4(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23580251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda.
    Kikulwe EM; Wesseler J; Falck-Zepeda J
    Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 21704665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Co-existence of agricultural production systems.
    Jank B; Rath J; Gaugitsch H
    Trends Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):198-200. PubMed ID: 16545877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.