148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26618752)
1. Sustainability Council of New Zealand Trust v. The Environmental Protection Authority: Gene editing technologies and the law.
Kershen DL
GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 26618752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina.
Whelan AI; Lema MA
GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(4):253-65. PubMed ID: 26552666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental risk assessment for medicinal products containing genetically modified organisms.
Anliker B; Longhurst S; Buchholz CJ
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Jan; 53(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19940966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating oversight systems for emerging technologies: a case study of genetically engineered organisms.
Kuzma J; Najmaie P; Larson J
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(4):546-86. PubMed ID: 20122100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asilomar's legacy in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Rogers-Hayden T
Sci Cult (Lond); 2005 Dec; 14(4):393-410. PubMed ID: 16622954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation.
Marchant GE; Stevens YA
GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 26930116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Another inconvenient truth. In Europe, no one apparently wants to listen if you have good news about genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1330. PubMed ID: 18066008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: bioethics commentary.
Pickering N
N Z Bioeth J; 2002 Feb; 3(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 15587483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An inconvenient version of events.
Monastra G
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 26(4):379; discussion 379-80. PubMed ID: 18392011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Embracing panarchy, building resilience and integrating adaptive management through a rebirth of the National Environmental Policy Act.
Benson MH; Garmestani AS
J Environ Manage; 2011 May; 92(5):1420-7. PubMed ID: 20961681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Law 9/2003, of April 25, establishing the legal procedure of confined utilization, voluntary liberation, and commercialization of genetically modified organisms].
Carlos J; De España R
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (18):223-48. PubMed ID: 14562479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.
Whelan AI; Lema MA
GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28080208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach.
Gupta S; Kumar A; Patel R; Kumar V
Mol Biol Rep; 2021 May; 48(5):4851-4863. PubMed ID: 34114124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clarifying the regulation of genome editing in Australia: situation for genetically modified organisms.
Thygesen P
Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):151-159. PubMed ID: 31321698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of environmental and economic regulations for promoting industrial waste recycling in Taiwan.
Tsai WT; Chou YH
Waste Manag; 2004; 24(10):1061-9. PubMed ID: 15567671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Who's afraid of biotechnology?
Tait J
New Sci; 1992 Jun; 134(1827):49. PubMed ID: 16044585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary: Is it possible to determine the extent to which informational asymmetries and prejudice bias responses?
Hurley T
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(4):594-7. PubMed ID: 20122102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
