These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26620192)

  • 1. Random forest Granger causality for detection of effective brain connectivity using high-dimensional data.
    Furqan MS; Siyal MY
    J Integr Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 15(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26620192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inference of biological networks using Bi-directional Random Forest Granger causality.
    Furqan MS; Siyal MY
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():514. PubMed ID: 27186478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of direct nonlinear effective connectivity using information theory and multilayer perceptron.
    Khadem A; Hossein-Zadeh GA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 229():53-67. PubMed ID: 24751646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elastic-Net Copula Granger Causality for Inference of Biological Networks.
    Furqan MS; Siyal MY
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165612. PubMed ID: 27792750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling.
    Friston K; Moran R; Seth AK
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2013 Apr; 23(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 23265964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Granger causality models and their applications in brain effective connectivity networks].
    Zhao T; Zheng G; Pan Z; Li Q; Wang L; Lu G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 30(6):1343-9. PubMed ID: 24645623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of effective connectivity in the brain using a measure of directed information.
    Liu Y; Aviyente S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():635103. PubMed ID: 22675401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring Granger causality between cortical regions from voxelwise fMRI BOLD signals with LASSO.
    Tang W; Bressler SL; Sylvester CM; Shulman GL; Corbetta M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(5):e1002513. PubMed ID: 22654651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the pulsed neuron networks' structures by a nonlinear Granger causality method.
    Zhu MJ; Dong CY; Chen XY; Ren JW; Zhao XY
    BMC Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 32050908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency-based approach to the study of semantic brain networks connectivity.
    Bianchi AM; Marchetta E; Tana MG; Tettamanti M; Rizzo G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Jan; 212(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 23085280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Multivariate Granger Causality Concept towards Full Brain Functional Connectivity.
    Schmidt C; Pester B; Schmid-Hertel N; Witte H; Wismüller A; Leistritz L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153105. PubMed ID: 27064897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Parametric Time-Frequency Conditional Granger Causality Method Using Ultra-Regularized Orthogonal Least Squares and Multiwavelets for Dynamic Connectivity Analysis in EEGs.
    Li Y; Lei M; Cui W; Guo Y; Wei HL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Dec; 66(12):3509-3525. PubMed ID: 30932821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality.
    Marinazzo D; Liao W; Chen H; Stramaglia S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 20132895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: a simulation study.
    Haufe S; Nikulin VV; Müller KR; Nolte G
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():120-33. PubMed ID: 23006806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting the topologies of complex networks with stochastic perturbations.
    Wu X; Zhou C; Chen G; Lu JA
    Chaos; 2011 Dec; 21(4):043129. PubMed ID: 22225366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of latent confounders in directed network analysis in neuroscience.
    Ramb R; Eichler M; Ing A; Thiel M; Weiller C; Grebogi C; Schwarzbauer C; Timmer J; Schelter B
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2013 Aug; 371(1997):20110612. PubMed ID: 23858480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructing fMRI connectivity networks: a whole brain functional parcellation method for node definition.
    Maggioni E; Tana MG; Arrigoni F; Zucca C; Bianchi AM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 228():86-99. PubMed ID: 24675050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Canonical Granger causality between regions of interest.
    Ashrafulla S; Haldar JP; Joshi AA; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():189-99. PubMed ID: 23811410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of multivariate Granger causality analyses with embedded dimension reduction on network modules.
    Schmidt C; Pester B; Nagarajan M; Witte H; Leistritz L; Wismueller A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2797-800. PubMed ID: 25570572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.