These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Validation, calibration, and specificity of quantitative D-dimer assays. Dempfle CE Semin Vasc Med; 2005 Nov; 5(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 16302152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of immunofiltration assay of plasma D-dimer with diagnostic imaging in deep vein thrombosis. Killick SB; Pentek PG; Mercieca JE; Clarke MF; Bevan DH Br J Haematol; 1997 Mar; 96(4):846-9. PubMed ID: 9074429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The harmonization of quantitative test results of different D-dimer methods. Meijer P; Kluft C Semin Vasc Med; 2005 Nov; 5(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16302153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of quantitative D-dimer methods: results of the Italian external quality assessment scheme. Tripodi A; Chantarangkul V J Thromb Haemost; 2007 Jan; 5(1):184-5. PubMed ID: 17026646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Monoclonal antibodies with equal specificity to D-dimer and high-molecular-weight fibrin degradation products. Kogan AE; Mukharyamova KS; Bereznikova AV; Filatov VL; Koshkina EV; Bloshchitsyna MN; Katrukha AG Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2016 Jul; 27(5):542-50. PubMed ID: 26656897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An assessment of recent improvements in D-dimer testing. Janetschek R Am Clin Lab; 2002 Jul; 21(6):25-7. PubMed ID: 12224179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new automated quantitative D-dimer, advanced D-dimer, in patients suspected of venous thromboembolism: a comment on correlation of D-dimer assays. Dempfle CE Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2003 Apr; 14(3):313-5. PubMed ID: 12695759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. D-dimer and duration of anticoagulation. Mannarino E; Schillaci G N Engl J Med; 2007 Jan; 356(4):421; author reply 423. PubMed ID: 17260409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. International survey on D-dimer test reporting: a call for standardization. Lippi G; Tripodi A; Simundic AM; Favaloro EJ Semin Thromb Hemost; 2015 Apr; 41(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 25839870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A model for the harmonisation of test results of different quantitative D-dimer methods. Meijer P; Haverkate F; Kluft C; de Moerloose P; Verbruggen B; Spannagl M Thromb Haemost; 2006 Mar; 95(3):567-72. PubMed ID: 16525589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a rapid qualitative immuno-chromatography D-dimer assay (Simplify D-dimer) for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in symptomatic outpatients with a low and intermediate pretest probability. Comparison with two automated quantitative assays. Toulon P; Lecourvoisier C; Meyniard O Thromb Res; 2009; 123(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 18692869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conventional detection method of fibrinogen and fibrin degradation products using latex piezoelectric immunoassay. Aizawa H; Kurosawa S; Tozuka M; Park JW; Kobayashi K; Tanaka H Biosens Bioelectron; 2003 May; 18(5-6):765-71. PubMed ID: 12706590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reference material for harmonisation of D-dimer assays. Fibrinogen Subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Nieuwenhuizen W Thromb Haemost; 1997 May; 77(5):1031-3. PubMed ID: 9184423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The antifibrinolytic action of the D-dimer fragment]. Rozenfel'd MA; Khavkina LS; Leonova VB; Gershkovich KB; Vasil'eva MV Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Biol; 1989; (6):855-61. PubMed ID: 2621282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Recent progress on analysis of blood coagulation factors and fibrinolytic agents; FDP D dimer analysis using NANOPIA FDP]. Matsumoto T; Sakai Y; Maeda M; Takei F Rinsho Byori; 1989 Apr; Spec No 81():183-8. PubMed ID: 2754806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of cross-linked fibrin degradation products as a measure of clot lysis. Eisenberg PR; Jaffe AS; Stump DC; Collen D; Bovill EG Circulation; 1990 Oct; 82(4):1159-68. PubMed ID: 2119264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different cut-off values of quantitative D-dimer methods to predict the risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence: a post-hoc analysis of the PROLONG study. Legnani C; Palareti G; Cosmi B; Cini M; Tosetto A; Tripodi A; Haematologica; 2008 Jun; 93(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 18443269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]