These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26621098)

  • 1. Examining the Effectiveness of Climate Change Frames in the Face of a Climate Change Denial Counter-Frame.
    McCright AM; Charters M; Dentzman K; Dietz T
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):76-97. PubMed ID: 26621098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Their Economy and Our Health: Communicating Climate Change to the Divided American Public.
    Chu H; Yang J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(21):. PubMed ID: 33105805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.
    Baldwin M; Lammers J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Dec; 113(52):14953-14957. PubMed ID: 27956619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global health and climate change: moving from denial and catastrophic fatalism to positive action.
    Costello A; Maslin M; Montgomery H; Johnson AM; Ekins P
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2011 May; 369(1942):1866-82. PubMed ID: 21464077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Information Provision on Public Consensus about Climate Change.
    Deryugina T; Shurchkov O
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0151469. PubMed ID: 27064486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Climate denial in Canada and the United States.
    Boulianne S; Belland S
    Can Rev Sociol; 2022 Aug; 59(3):369-394. PubMed ID: 35726800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How issue frames shape beliefs about the importance of climate change policy across ideological and partisan groups.
    Singh SP; Swanson M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181401. PubMed ID: 28727842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Webs of Denial: Climate Change and the Challenge to Public Health.
    Rosner D
    Milbank Q; 2016 Dec; 94(4):733-735. PubMed ID: 27995720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: Implications for Public Discourse.
    Torcello L
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):19-48. PubMed ID: 26799170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The geographic distribution and economic value of climate change-related ozone health impacts in the United States in 2030.
    Fann N; Nolte CG; Dolwick P; Spero TL; Brown AC; Phillips S; Anenberg S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 May; 65(5):570-80. PubMed ID: 25947315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rational Irrationality: Modeling Climate Change Belief Polarization Using Bayesian Networks.
    Cook J; Lewandowsky S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):160-79. PubMed ID: 26749179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expert credibility in climate change.
    Anderegg WR; Prall JW; Harold J; Schneider SH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jul; 107(27):12107-9. PubMed ID: 20566872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science denial: a guide for scientists.
    Rosenau J
    Trends Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 20(12):567-9. PubMed ID: 23164600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of policy problems and solutions: Climate change and structural racism.
    Kantack BR; Paschall CE
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Feb; 32(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 36437690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Framing Climate Change Impacts as Moral Violations: The Pathway of Perceived Message Credibility.
    Huang J; Yang JZ; Chu H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Counteracting climate denial: A systematic review.
    Mendy L; Karlsson M; Lindvall D
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 May; 33(4):504-520. PubMed ID: 38243813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientists' views about attribution of global warming.
    Verheggen B; Strengers B; Cook J; van Dorland R; Vringer K; Peters J; Visser H; Meyer L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):8963-71. PubMed ID: 25051508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ignorance or bias? Evaluating the ideological and informational drivers of communication gaps about climate change.
    Nisbet EC; Cooper KE; Ellithorpe M
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Apr; 24(3):285-301. PubMed ID: 25161166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NASA faked the moon landing--therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science.
    Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K; Gignac GE
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):622-33. PubMed ID: 23531484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To frame is to explain: a deductive frame-analysis of Dutch and French climate change coverage during the annual UN Conferences of the Parties.
    Dirikx A; Gelders D
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Nov; 19(6):732-42. PubMed ID: 21560546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.