These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26622282)

  • 1. Unilateral Outer Bow Expanded Cervical Headgear Force System: 3D Analysis Using Finite Element Method.
    Geramy A; Mortezai O; Esmaily M; Darvishpour H
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Apr; 12(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 26622282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetric Outer Bow Length and Cervical Headgear Force System: 3D Analysis Using Finite Element Method.
    Geramy A; Hassanpour M; Emadian Razavi ES
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Mar; 12(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 26622275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element method (FEM) analysis of the force systems produced by asymmetric inner headgear bows.
    Geramy A; Kizilova N; Terekhov L
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 22372268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetric Head Gear: A Comparison between Unilateral Outer Bow Expansion and Unilateral Outer Bow Shortening - an Energy Approach using the Finite Element Method.
    Geramy A; Martin D; Bouserhal J; Emadian Razavi ES; Hassanpour M
    Chin J Dent Res; 2016 Jun; 19(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 27379347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two asymmetric headgear force systems: A finite element analysis.
    Sadeghi S; Hedayati Z; Mousavi-Fard B
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 May; 24(2):41.e1-41.e6. PubMed ID: 31116285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetric headgear for differential molar movement: a study using finite element analysis.
    Squeff LR; Ruellas AC; Penedo ND; Elias CN; Sant'anna EF; Casaccia GR; Gomes JC; Gouvêa JP
    J Orthod; 2009 Sep; 36(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 19741175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of asymmetric mesio-distal molar positions loaded by a symmetric cervical headgear.
    Kizilova N; Geramy A; Romashov Y
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(4):97-106. PubMed ID: 28133376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unequal outer and inner bow configurations: comparing 2 asymmetric headgear systems.
    Brosh T; Portal S; Sarne O; Vardimon AD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):68-75; discussion 75-7. PubMed ID: 16027627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Biomechanic of the asymmetrical headgear].
    Sander FG
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1990 Nov; 4(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 2135592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial tooth movement under extraoral force and considerations for controlled molar movement.
    Yoshida N; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yamada Y
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 7639433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cervical headgear with angled outer arms. A biomechanically comprehensible system?].
    Breier M; Bourauel C; Drescher D
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1995 May; 56(3):165-74. PubMed ID: 7789926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in dental arch dimensions by use of an orthopedic cervical headgear in Class II correction.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T; Haavikko K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 9009925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tridimensional finite element analysis of teeth movement induced by different headgear forces.
    Maruo IT; Maruo H; Saga AY; de Oliveira DD; Argenta MA; Tanaka OM
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27264500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The effect of molar position on the distalization behavior of indirect headgear].
    Breier M; Bourauel C; Drescher D; Schwarze CW
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1995 Jul; 56(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 7649515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Indication and application of the cervical traction headgear].
    Kahl B
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1991 May; 5(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 1815793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The relationship between the movement of molars and the transmitted mechanism of orthodontic forces in extraoral anchorage (2)].
    Kobayashi K; Arai H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 48(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 2632652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effects on upper first molars by the face-bow construction. Consideration of utilizing the strain gauge method and the computer method of structural analysis].
    Nakamura R
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 48(2):246-66. PubMed ID: 2632655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear.
    Lima Filho RM; Lima AL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 12725376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):507-15. PubMed ID: 19361738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.