167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2662254)
1. Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation.
Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Sugarbaker PH; Bernardino ME
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 2662254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of CT, MRI and CT during arterial portography in the detection of malignant hepatic lesions.
Kehagias D; Metafa A; Hatziioannou A; Mourikis D; Vourtsi A; Prahalias A; Smyrniotis V; Gouliamos A; Vlahos L
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(35):1399-403. PubMed ID: 11100361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging.
Heiken JP; Weyman PJ; Lee JK; Balfe DM; Picus D; Brunt EM; Flye MW
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2538862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging for focal hepatic lesions: a comparison with CT during arterioportography plus CT during hepatic arteriography.
Tanimoto A; Wakabayashi G; Shinmoto H; Nakatsuka S; Okuda S; Kuribayashi S
J Gastroenterol; 2005 Apr; 40(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 15870974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of CT during arterial portography and MR during arterial portography in the detection of liver metastases.
Hosch WP; Schmidt SM; Plaza S; Dechow C; Schmidt J; Ley S; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1502-11. PubMed ID: 16714637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of colorectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of unenhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T, dual-phase spiral CT, and spiral CT during arterial portography.
Lencioni R; Donati F; Cioni D; Paolicchi A; Cicorelli A; Bartolozzi C
MAGMA; 1998 Dec; 7(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 9951768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liver metastases: comparison of current MR techniques and spiral CT during arterial portography for detection in 20 surgically staged cases.
Semelka RC; Cance WG; Marcos HB; Mauro MA
Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 10540645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT done 4-6 hr after CT arterial portography: value in detecting hepatic tumors and differentiating from other hepatic perfusion defects.
Nazarian LN; Wechsler RJ; Grady CK; Needleman L; Halpern EJ; Copit SE; Shapiro MJ; Rosato FE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):851-5. PubMed ID: 8092022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malignant liver lesions: comparison of spiral CT arterial portography and MR imaging for diagnostic accuracy, cost, and effect on patient management.
Semelka RC; Schlund JF; Molina PL; Willms AB; Kahlenberg M; Mauro MA; Weeks SM; Cance WG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8851401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT during arterial portography for the preoperative evaluation of hepatic tumors: how, when, and why?
Soyer P; Bluemke DA; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1325-31. PubMed ID: 7992722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging during arterial portography for assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with CT during arterial portography.
Yu JS; Kim KW; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jun; 170(6):1501-6. PubMed ID: 9609162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Detection of malignant focal hepatic lesions. Comparison of ultrasonography, computerized tomography during arterial portography, delayed computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].
Schneider F; Chapuis L; Gillet M; Leyvraz S; Schnyder P; Meuli R
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1999 Jan; 23(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 10219611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: MR imaging versus angiographically assisted helical CT.
Kanematsu M; Hoshi H; Murakami T; Inaba Y; Kim T; Yamada T; Kato M; Yokoyama R; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1507-15. PubMed ID: 9393154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of surgical resectability in patients with hepatic colorectal metastases.
Vogel SB; Drane WE; Ros PR; Kerns SR; Bland KI
Ann Surg; 1994 May; 219(5):508-14; discussion 514-6. PubMed ID: 8185401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is CT portography (CTAP) really useful in patients with liver tumors who undergo intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)?
Fortunato L; Clair M; Hoffman J; Sigurdson ER; Sauter ER; Barber LW; Eisenberg B
Am Surg; 1995 Jul; 61(7):560-5. PubMed ID: 7793734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Focal hepatic masses: comparison of detection during arterial portography with MR imaging and CT.
Soyer P; Laissy JP; Sibert A; Blanc F; Belghiti J; Marmuse JP; Zeitoun G; Levesque M; Menu Y
Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):737-40. PubMed ID: 8115620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The pre-operative stratification of patients with colorectal liver metastases: computed tomography arterial portography (CTAP) has no added value.
Kouwenhoven ST; Liefers GJ; van Erkel AR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 36(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 19556096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR portography: preliminary comparison with CT portography and conventional MR imaging.
Dravid VS; Shapiro MJ; Mitchell DG; Outwater EK; Piccoli CW; Feld RI; Wechsler RJ; Rosato FE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(6):767-71. PubMed ID: 7865935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT evaluation of hepatic tumors: comparison of CT with arterial portography, CT with infusion hepatic arteriography, and simultaneous use of both techniques.
Irie T; Takeshita K; Wada Y; Kusano S; Terahata S; Tamai S; Hatsuse K; Aoki H; Sugiura Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jun; 164(6):1407-12. PubMed ID: 7754883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of hepatic neoplasms by computed tomographic arterial portography in cirrhotic patients.
Wang J; Tsang YM; Lee PH; Wei TC; Lai MY; Hsu HC; Chen DS
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 Dec; 96(12):955-61. PubMed ID: 9444914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
