176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26622946)
21. Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.
McFadden D; Martin GK; Stagner BB; Maloney MM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):239-46. PubMed ID: 19173411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Criteria for detection of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Jedrzejczak WW; Skarzynski H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1455-61. PubMed ID: 26166450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sex-Related Cochlear Impairment in Cigarette Smokers.
Lisowska G; Jochem J; Gierlotka A; Misiołek M; Ścierski W
Med Sci Monit; 2017 Jan; 23():377-397. PubMed ID: 28110343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency hearing thresholds in children and adolescents.
Groh D; Pelanova J; Jilek M; Popelar J; Kabelka Z; Syka J
Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):90-8. PubMed ID: 16364580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
Ortmann AJ; Abdala C
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in humans with endolymphatic hydrops.
Haginomori SI; Makimoto K; Tanaka H; Araki M; Takenaka H
Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 11192908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren measured by two commercial devices.
Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1724-8. PubMed ID: 23972827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On a possible prognostic value of otoacoustic emissions: a study on patients with sudden hearing loss.
Hoth S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 262(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 15133692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the evaluation of elderly persons.
Bertoli S; Probst R
Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 9288474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and tympanometric measurements in an adult population-based study.
Uchida Y; Ando F; Nakata S; Ueda H; Nakashima T; Niino N; Shimokata H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Dec; 33(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 16753276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds.
Helleman HW; Jansen EJ; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):410-9. PubMed ID: 20192875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. EFFECT OF SMOKING ON TRASIENTLY EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION.
Gegenava Kh; Japaridze Sh; Sharashenidze N; Jalabadze G; Kevanishvili Z
Georgian Med News; 2016 Jan; (250):12-6. PubMed ID: 26870969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors.
Cane MA; Lutman ME; O'Donoghue GM
Am J Otol; 1994 Mar; 15(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 8172303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multi-variant analysis of otoacoustic emissions and estimation of hearing thresholds: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Vinck BM; Van Cauwenberge PB; Corthals P; De Vel E
Audiology; 1998; 37(6):315-34. PubMed ID: 9888189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Changes in otoacoustic emission during the glycerol test in the ears of patients with Meniere's disease].
Sakashita T; Kubo T; Kyunai K; Ueno K; Hikawa C; Shibata T; Yamane H; Kusuki M; Wada T; Uyama T
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2001 Jun; 104(6):682-93. PubMed ID: 11494522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of otoacoustic emissions on just-noticeable differences for intensity in normally hearing subjects.
Probst R; Harris FP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):504-10. PubMed ID: 8675843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Otoacoustic Emissions in Children with Long-Term Middle Ear Disease.
Sanfins MD; Bertazolli LF; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynska MB; Donadon C; Colella-Santos MF
Life (Basel); 2020 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 33217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
