BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26623535)

  • 1. Diagnostic Agreement Between Clinicians and Clients: The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the SWAP-200 and MCMI-III Personality Disorder Scales.
    Gritti ES; Samuel DB; Lang M
    J Pers Disord; 2016 Dec; 30(6):796-812. PubMed ID: 26623535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the psychometric properties and construct validity of the MCMI-III anxiety and avoidant personality scales.
    Blais MA; Holdwick DJ; McLean RY; Otto MW; Pollack MH; Hilsenroth MJ
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 14638448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI as a measure of the DSM-III personality disorders.
    Widiger TA; Sanderson C
    J Pers Assess; 1987; 51(2):228-42. PubMed ID: 3598841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Issues in the assessment of personality disorder and substance abuse using the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-II).
    Flynn PM; McCann JT; Fairbank JA
    J Clin Psychol; 1995 May; 51(3):415-21. PubMed ID: 7560145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between clinician assessment and self-assessment of personality disorders using the SWAP-200 and PAI.
    Bradley R; Hilsenroth M; Guarnaccia C; Westen D
    Psychol Assess; 2007 Jun; 19(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 17563203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revising and assessing axis II, Part I: developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method.
    Westen D; Shedler J
    Am J Psychiatry; 1999 Feb; 156(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 9989563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic agreement between the Personality Disorder Examination and the MCMI-II.
    Soldz S; Budman S; Demby A; Merry J
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Jun; 60(3):486-99. PubMed ID: 8336264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].
    Massoubre C; Bonnefond H; Grosselin A; Nelva A; Pellet J; Lang F
    Encephale; 2009 Dec; 35(6):544-53. PubMed ID: 20004285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimates of the ability of the MMPI and MCMI personality disorder scales and the SIDP to identify personality disorders.
    Miller HR; Streiner DL; Parkinson A
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Aug; 59(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1512671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing personality disorders using a systematic clinical interview: evaluation of an alternative to structured interviews.
    Westen D; Muderrisoglu S
    J Pers Disord; 2003 Aug; 17(4):351-69. PubMed ID: 14521183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality disorder assessment for psychiatric inpatients.
    Nazikian H; Rudd RP; Edwards J; Jackson HJ
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1990 Mar; 24(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 2334386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Convergent validity of the MCMI-III personality disorder scales and the MMPI-2 scales.
    Rossi G; Van den Brande I; Tobac A; Sloore H; Hauben C
    J Pers Disord; 2003 Aug; 17(4):330-40. PubMed ID: 14521181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The MCMI as a measure of DSM-III.
    Widiger TA; Williams JB; Spitzer RL; Frances A
    J Pers Assess; 1985 Aug; 49(4):366-78. PubMed ID: 4045683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concordance between two personality disorder instruments with psychiatric inpatients.
    Jackson HJ; Gazis J; Rudd RP; Edwards J
    Compr Psychiatry; 1991; 32(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 1884605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the SWAP-200 in a personality-disordered forensic population: is it valid, reliable and useful?
    Marin-Avellan LE; McGauley G; Campbell C; Fonagy P
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(1):28-45. PubMed ID: 16470497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between the MCMI personality scales and DSM-III, axis II.
    Torgersen S; Alnaes R
    J Pers Assess; 1990; 55(3-4):698-707. PubMed ID: 2280333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient and clinician agreement on personality using the SWAP-200.
    Davidson KM; Obonsawin MC; Seils M; Patience L
    J Pers Disord; 2003 Jun; 17(3):208-18. PubMed ID: 12839100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative validity of MMPI-2 and MCMI-II personality disorder classifications.
    Wise EA
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Jun; 66(3):569-82. PubMed ID: 8667148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Personality diagnoses in adolescence: DSM-IV axis II diagnoses and an empirically derived alternative.
    Westen D; Shedler J; Durrett C; Glass S; Martens A
    Am J Psychiatry; 2003 May; 160(5):952-66. PubMed ID: 12727701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships between the personality beliefs questionnaire and self-rated personality disorders.
    Jones SH; Burrell-Hodgson G; Tate G
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2007 Jun; 46(Pt 2):247-51. PubMed ID: 17524218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.