These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26623548)

  • 1. Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?
    Chalmers EV; McIntyre GT; Wang W; Gillgrass T; Martin CB; Mossey PA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Sep; 53(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 26623548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The validity and reliability of an automated method of scoring dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate using the modified Huddart-Bodenham scoring system.
    Martin CB; Ma X; McIntyre GT; Wang W; Lin P; Chalmers EV; Mossey PA
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 27105652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Modified Huddart-Bodenham Scoring System and GOSLON Yardstick to Assess Dental Arch Relationships in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Yakob M; Hassan YR; Tse KL; Gu M; Yang Y
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Aug; 55(7):983-988. PubMed ID: 28092164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental arch relationships on three-dimensional digital study models and conventional plaster study models for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Asquith JA; McIntyre GT
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Sep; 49(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 21214319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of Three Viewing Media for Assessing Dental Arch Relationships in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Zhu S; Yang Y; Gu M; Khambay B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Sep; 53(5):578-83. PubMed ID: 26406557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validating the Clinical Use of the Modified Huddart and Bodenham Scoring System for Outcome in Cleft Lip and/or Palate.
    Dobbyn L; Gillgrass T; McIntyre G; Macfarlane T; Mossey P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):671-5. PubMed ID: 23919521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of a Categorical Scale (GOSLON) and a Continuous Scale (10-cm Visual Analog Scale) for Assessing Dental Arch Relationships Using Conventional Plaster and 3D Digital Orthodontic Study Models of Children With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Fowler P; Bellardie H; Shaw B; Eyres P; Semb G; Thompson J
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Jan; 56(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 29698112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of the modified Huddart and Bodenham scoring system against the GOSLON/5-year-olds' index for unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Dobbyn LM; Weir JT; Macfarlane TV; Mossey PA
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 21976635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital Three-Dimensional Automation of the Modified Huddart and Bodenham Scoring System for Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Ma X; Martin C; McIntyre G; Lin P; Mossey P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 27136074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between the modified Huddart and Bodenham index and the GOSLON yardstick for assessing occlusal characteristics at 5 and 10 years of age in individuals born with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Almuhizi Y; Leser A; Pegelow M
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 27365183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rating dental arch relationships and palatal morphology with the EUROCRAN index on three different formats of dental casts in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Sabelis AJ; Kuijpers MA; Nada RM; Chiu YT; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Fudalej PS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):943-50. PubMed ID: 26462656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.
    Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system for assessment of maxillary arch constriction in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects.
    Gray D; Mossey PA
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 16143699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.
    Burzynski JA; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Fields HW; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 29602345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique for a Neonate With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Patel J; Winters J; Walters M
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Sep; 56(8):1120-1123. PubMed ID: 30857398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective intercenter comparison of two surgical protocols through the dental arch relationship of 5- to 6-year-old unilateral cleft patients.
    Thierens LA; Lewyllie A; Temmerman L; De Roo NM; Verdonck A; Cadenas de Llano Perula M; Willems G; De Pauw GA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1777-1784. PubMed ID: 30171346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.