These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26624973)

  • 1. Quantitative Features of Liver Lesions, Lung Nodules, and Renal Stones at Multi-Detector Row CT Examinations: Dependency on Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Algorithm.
    Solomon J; Mileto A; Nelson RC; Roy Choudhury K; Samei E
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 26624973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
    Solomon J; Marin D; Roy Choudhury K; Patel B; Samei E
    Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):777-787. PubMed ID: 28170300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
    Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low contrast agent and radiation dose protocol for hepatic dynamic CT of thin adults at 256-detector row CT: effect of low tube voltage and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm on image quality.
    Nakaura T; Nakamura S; Maruyama N; Funama Y; Awai K; Harada K; Uemura S; Yamashita Y
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):445-54. PubMed ID: 22627597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Prakash P; Kalra MK; Ackman JB; Digumarthy SR; Hsieh J; Do S; Shepard JA; Gilman MD
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):261-9. PubMed ID: 20574099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Katsura M; Matsuda I; Akahane M; Yasaka K; Hanaoka S; Akai H; Sato J; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 23344517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Size and volume of kidney stones in computed tomography: Influence of acquisition techniques and image reconstruction parameters.
    Reimer RP; Salem J; Merkt M; Sonnabend K; Lennartz S; Zopfs D; Heidenreich A; Maintz D; Haneder S; Große Hokamp N
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109267. PubMed ID: 32949914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic.
    Fontarensky M; Alfidja A; Perignon R; Schoenig A; Perrier C; Mulliez A; Guy L; Boyer L
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 25848899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of dual-energy multi-detector row CT with virtual monochromatic imaging on renal cyst pseudoenhancement: in vitro and in vivo study.
    Mileto A; Nelson RC; Samei E; Jaffe TA; Paulson EK; Barina A; Choudhury KR; Wilson JM; Marin D
    Radiology; 2014 Sep; 272(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 24844472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
    Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm in ultralow-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: evaluation of radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic performance.
    Park SB; Kim YS; Lee JB; Park HJ
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3137-46. PubMed ID: 26197735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.