These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26625069)

  • 1. Spatial evolution of depolarization in homogeneous turbid media within the differential Mueller matrix formalism.
    Agarwal N; Yoon J; Garcia-Caurel E; Novikova T; Vanel JC; Pierangelo A; Bykov A; Popov A; Meglinski I; Ossikovski R
    Opt Lett; 2015 Dec; 40(23):5634-7. PubMed ID: 26625069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stochastic model for the differential Mueller matrix of stationary and nonstationary turbid media.
    Charbois JM; Devlaminck V
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2016 Dec; 33(12):2414-2424. PubMed ID: 27906267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the evolution of circular polarized light backscattered from turbid tissue-like disperse medium utilizing generalized Monte Carlo modeling approach with a combined use of Jones and Stokes-Mueller formalisms.
    Lopushenko I; Sieryi O; Bykov A; Meglinski I
    J Biomed Opt; 2024 May; 29(5):052913. PubMed ID: 38089555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polar decomposition of 3 x 3 Mueller matrix: a tool for quantitative tissue polarimetry.
    Swami MK; Manhas S; Buddhiwant P; Ghosh N; Uppal A; Gupta PK
    Opt Express; 2006 Oct; 14(20):9324-37. PubMed ID: 19529316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of differential matrix and extended polar decomposition formalisms for polarimetric characterization of complex tissue-like turbid media.
    Kumar S; Purwar H; Ossikovski R; Vitkin IA; Ghosh N
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Oct; 17(10):105006. PubMed ID: 23064484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of tissue polarimetric properties using Stokes polarimetric imaging with circularly polarized illumination.
    Qi J; He H; Lin J; Dong Y; Chen D; Ma H; Elson DS
    J Biophotonics; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e201700139. PubMed ID: 29131523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical meaning of the differential Mueller matrix of depolarizing homogeneous media.
    Ossikovski R; Arteaga O
    Opt Lett; 2014 Aug; 39(15):4470-3. PubMed ID: 25078205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-resolved Mueller matrix imaging polarimetry.
    Berezhnyy I; Dogariu A
    Opt Express; 2004 Sep; 12(19):4635-49. PubMed ID: 19484016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential Mueller matrix of a depolarizing homogeneous medium and its relation to the Mueller matrix logarithm.
    Ossikovski R; De Martino A
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Feb; 32(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 26366607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential matrix formalism for depolarizing anisotropic media.
    Ossikovski R
    Opt Lett; 2011 Jun; 36(12):2330-2. PubMed ID: 21686010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wide-field Mueller matrix polarimetry for spectral characterization of basic biological tissues: Muscle, fat, connective tissue, and skin.
    Pardo I; Bian S; Gomis-Brescó J; Pascual E; Canillas A; Bosch S; Arteaga O
    J Biophotonics; 2024 Jan; 17(1):e202300252. PubMed ID: 37743627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diattenuation and retardance signature of plasmonic gold nanorods in turbid media revealed by Mueller matrix polarimetry.
    Ray SK; Ghosh N; Vitkin A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20017. PubMed ID: 34625628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review.
    Qi J; Elson DS
    J Biophotonics; 2017 Aug; 10(8):950-982. PubMed ID: 28464464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physically meaningful depolarization metric based on the differential Mueller matrix.
    Ortega-Quijano N; Fanjul-Vélez F; Arce-Diego JL
    Opt Lett; 2015 Jul; 40(14):3280-3. PubMed ID: 26176449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Size-dependent patterns in depolarization maps from turbid medium and tissue.
    Swami MK; Patel H; Somyaji MR; Kushwaha PK; Gupta PK
    Appl Opt; 2014 Sep; 53(27):6133-9. PubMed ID: 25322088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uniqueness of the differential Mueller matrix of uniform homogeneous media.
    Devlaminck V; Ossikovski R
    Opt Lett; 2014 Jun; 39(11):3149-52. PubMed ID: 24875999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mueller matrix holographic method for small particle characterization: theory and numerical studies.
    Gao M; Yang P; McKee D; Kattawar GW
    Appl Opt; 2013 Jul; 52(21):5289-96. PubMed ID: 23872778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic Mueller matrix polarimetry using generalized measurements.
    McWilliam A; Al Khafaji MA; Svensson SJ; Pádua S; Franke-Arnold S
    Opt Express; 2024 Jun; 32(12):21909-21924. PubMed ID: 38859533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complex Spatial Illumination Scheme Optimization of Backscattering Mueller Matrix Polarimetry for Tissue Imaging and Biosensing.
    Jiao W; Zhang Z; Zeng N; Hao R; He H; He C; Ma H
    Biosensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38667201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Historical revision of the differential Stokes-Mueller formalism: discussion.
    Arteaga O
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Mar; 34(3):410-414. PubMed ID: 28248367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.