These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26625540)

  • 1. Assessing the Need for Hospitalization in Order to Conduct a Psychiatric Evaluation as part of Criminal Law Procedure.
    Olmer A; Greenberg B; Strous RD
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2015 Sep; 17(9):533-7. PubMed ID: 26625540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary: A road map for research in restoration of competency to stand trial.
    Scott CL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 12817841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Residential mental health assessment within Dutch criminal cases: a discussion.
    van der Leij JB; Jackson JL; Malsch M; Nijboer JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(5-6):691-702. PubMed ID: 11787076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disagreements between court and psychiatrist on competency to stand trial.
    Reich JH; Tookey L
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1986 Jan; 47(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 3941053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitness, responsibility, and judicially ordered assessments.
    Ohayon MM; Crocker A; St-Onge B; Caulet M
    Can J Psychiatry; 1998 Jun; 43(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 9653533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The imminent peril in the law of July the fifth 2011, two years later: the impact on health?].
    Mondoloni A; Buard M; Nargeot J; Vacheron MN
    Encephale; 2014 Dec; 40(6):468-73. PubMed ID: 24703930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
    Gutheil TG
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Investigation of verdicts in lawsuits involving competency to stand trial].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2006; 108(11):1128-41. PubMed ID: 17313060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychiatry and the death penalty.
    Scott CL
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):791-804. PubMed ID: 16904512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Progress in standard assessment on competency to stand trial of mentally disordered offenders].
    Chen XB; Cai WX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 28(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23033670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reassessing the aftercare treatment of individuals found not guilty due to a mental disability in Hunan, China: supplemental study into the disposition of mentally ill offenders after forensic psychiatric assessment.
    Wang X; Zhang D; Jiang S; Bai Y; Cucolo HE; Perlin ML
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 17464720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of criminal defendants referred for multiple psychiatric examinations regarding their competency to stand trial.
    Bluestone H; Melella J; Baskin D
    J Forensic Sci; 1981 Apr; 26(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 7264586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: an empirical analysis.
    Borum R; Grisso T
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(3):297-317. PubMed ID: 8889131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Chauhan P; Dietz PE; Morris J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 15048857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of concordance between conclusions of forensic psychiatric evaluation and court decisions after 2005 Criminal Code Amendment in a Taiwan psychiatric hospital.
    Yang TW; Yu JM; Pan CH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():148-154. PubMed ID: 28743408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.