These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26626091)

  • 21. Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?
    D'Eath RB; Arnott G; Turner SP; Jensen T; Lahrmann HP; Busch ME; Niemi JK; Lawrence AB; Sandøe P
    Animal; 2014 Sep; 8(9):1479-97. PubMed ID: 25130712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of tail docking and tail biting on performance and welfare of growing-finishing pigs in a confinement housing system.
    Li YZ; Zhang HF; Johnston LJ; Martin W; Peterson JD; Coetzee JF
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4835-4845. PubMed ID: 29293713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High biosecurity and welfare standards in fattening pig farms are associated with reduced antimicrobial use.
    Stygar AH; Chantziaras I; Toppari I; Maes D; Niemi JK
    Animal; 2020 Oct; 14(10):2178-2186. PubMed ID: 32349838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk factors for vulva biting in breeding sows in south-west England.
    Rizvi S; Nicol CJ; Green LE
    Vet Rec; 1998 Dec; 143(24):654-8. PubMed ID: 9885129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evidence for a link between tail biting and central monoamine metabolism in pigs (Sus scrofa domestica).
    Valros A; Palander P; Heinonen M; Munsterhjelm C; Brunberg E; Keeling L; Piepponen P
    Physiol Behav; 2015 May; 143():151-7. PubMed ID: 25728243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies.
    Taylor NR; Parker RM; Mendl M; Edwards SA; Main DC
    Vet J; 2012 Oct; 194(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 22503206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Review: The tale of the Finnish pig tail - how to manage non-docked pigs?
    Valros A
    Animal; 2022 Jun; 16 Suppl 2():100353. PubMed ID: 34563464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An investigation into the effectiveness of compressed straw blocks in reducing abnormal behaviour in growing pigs.
    Haigh A; Yun-Chou J; O'Driscoll K
    Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2576-2585. PubMed ID: 31062680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms.
    Telkänranta H; Marchant JN; Valros A
    Animal; 2016 Feb; 10(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 26303891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can increased dietary fibre level and a single enrichment device reduce the risk of tail biting in undocked growing-finishing pigs in fully slatted systems?
    Chou JY; O'Driscoll K; Sandercock DA; D'Eath RB
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241619. PubMed ID: 33125443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tail-biting and tail-docking in pigs.
    Bower J
    Vet Rec; 1998 Feb; 142(9):227. PubMed ID: 9533301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Seven Measures to Reduce Tail Biting Lesions in Fattening Pigs.
    Niemi JK; Edwards SA; Papanastasiou DK; Piette D; Stygar AH; Wallenbeck A; Valros A
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():682330. PubMed ID: 34557537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The 'Real Welfare' scheme: benchmarking welfare outcomes for commercially farmed pigs.
    Pandolfi F; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Kyriazakis I; Edwards SA
    Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1816-1824. PubMed ID: 28249629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.
    Pandolfi F; Kyriazakis I; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Edwards SA
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():34-43. PubMed ID: 28992926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tail biting: an important and undesirable behaviour of growing pigs.
    Stafford KJ
    Vet J; 2010 Nov; 186(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 20015669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Jejunal morphology and blood metabolites in tail biting, victim and control pigs.
    Palander PA; Heinonen M; Simpura I; Edwards SA; Valros AE
    Animal; 2013 Sep; 7(9):1523-31. PubMed ID: 23597306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the prevalence of tail biting and carcase condemnations in slaughter pigs in the Republic and Northern Ireland, and the potential of abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool.
    Harley S; More SJ; O'Connell NE; Hanlon A; Teixeira D; Boyle L
    Vet Rec; 2012 Dec; 171(24):621. PubMed ID: 23248113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in activity and object manipulation before tail damage in finisher pigs as an early detector of tail biting.
    Larsen MLV; Andersen HM; Pedersen LJ
    Animal; 2019 May; 13(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 30324902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A link between damaging behaviour in pigs, sanitary conditions, and dietary protein and amino acid supply.
    Meer YV; Gerrits WJJ; Jansman AJM; Kemp B; Bolhuis JE
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0174688. PubMed ID: 28481880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physiological indicators of stress and meat and carcass characteristics in tail bitten slaughter pigs.
    Valros A; Munsterhjelm C; Puolanne E; Ruusunen M; Heinonen M; Peltoniemi OA; Pösö AR
    Acta Vet Scand; 2013 Oct; 55(1):75. PubMed ID: 24172255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.