340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26626794)
1. Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Patients Not Responsive to a First Dose of Dinoprostone: A Randomized Prospective Study.
Antonazzo P; Laoreti A; Personeni C; Grossi E; Martinelli A; Cetin I
Reprod Sci; 2016 Jun; 23(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 26626794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oxytocin versus sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary for labor induction of unfavorable cervix with Bishop score ≥ 4 and ≤ 6: a randomized controlled trial.
Koc O; Duran B; Ozdemirci S; Albayrak M; Koc U
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Apr; 39(4):790-8. PubMed ID: 23167718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of prolonged dinoprostone cervical ripening on the rate of artificial induction of labor: a prospective study of 330 patients.
Denoual-Ziad C; Aicardi-Nicolas S; Creveuil C; Gaillard C; Dreyfus M; Benoist G
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Mar; 41(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 25331791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I; Gaudier FL
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix.
Bolnick JM; Velazquez MD; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; McIlwain-Dunivan G; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14749647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravaginal glyceryl trinitrate and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Nunes FP; Campos AP; Pedroso SR; Leite CF; Avillez TP; Rodrigues RD; Meirinho M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 194(4):1022-6. PubMed ID: 16580291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.
Bouchghoul H; Zeino S; Houllier M; Senat MV
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101699. PubMed ID: 32018044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there an interest in repeating the vaginal administration of dinoprostone (Propess®), to promote induction of labor of pregnant women at term? (RE-DINO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Coste Mazeau P; Hessas M; Martin R; Eyraud JL; Margueritte F; Aubard Y; Sallee C; Sire F; Gauthier T
Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):51. PubMed ID: 31915047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of low-dose oxytocin and dinoprostone for labor induction in postterm pregnancies: a randomized controlled prospective study.
Akay NÖ; Hızlı D; Yılmaz SS; Yalvaç S; Kandemir O
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 73(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 22433939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
