BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26627174)

  • 1. Assessment of Detection and Refinement Strategies for de novo Protein Structures Using Force Field and Statistical Potentials.
    Lee MS; Olson MA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2007 Jan; 3(1):312-24. PubMed ID: 26627174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between self-guided Langevin dynamics and molecular dynamics simulations for structure refinement of protein loop conformations.
    Olson MA; Chaudhury S; Lee MS
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Nov; 32(14):3014-22. PubMed ID: 21793008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of replica exchange umbrella sampling to protein structure refinement of nontemplate models.
    Olson MA; Lee MS
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Jul; 34(20):1785-93. PubMed ID: 23703032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mimicking the action of folding chaperones by Hamiltonian replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations: application in the refinement of de novo models.
    Fan H; Periole X; Mark AE
    Proteins; 2012 Jul; 80(7):1744-54. PubMed ID: 22411697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Refinement of NMR structures using implicit solvent and advanced sampling techniques.
    Chen J; Im W; Brooks CL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(49):16038-47. PubMed ID: 15584737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.
    Lee MC; Duan Y
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 15103626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of protein loop conformations using multiscale modeling methods with physical energy scoring functions.
    Olson MA; Feig M; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(5):820-31. PubMed ID: 17876760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking.
    Wroblewska L; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Sep; 28(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 17407093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination of Native-like States of Membrane Proteins with Implicit Membrane-based Scoring Functions.
    Dutagaci B; Wittayanarakul K; Mori T; Feig M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jun; 13(6):3049-3059. PubMed ID: 28475346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulated annealing coupled replica exchange molecular dynamics--an efficient conformational sampling method.
    Kannan S; Zacharias M
    J Struct Biol; 2009 Jun; 166(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 19272454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structure refinement of protein model decoys requires accurate side-chain placement.
    Olson MA; Lee MS
    Proteins; 2013 Mar; 81(3):469-78. PubMed ID: 23070940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculation of protein heat capacity from replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations with different implicit solvent models.
    Yeh IC; Lee MS; Olson MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Nov; 112(47):15064-73. PubMed ID: 18959439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhou Y
    Protein Sci; 2004 Feb; 13(2):391-9. PubMed ID: 14739324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure?
    Chen J; Brooks CL
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):922-30. PubMed ID: 17373704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pair Potentials as Machine Learning Features.
    Pei J; Song LF; Merz KM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Aug; 16(8):5385-5400. PubMed ID: 32559380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
    Dominy BN; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protein Folding Simulations Combining Self-Guided Langevin Dynamics and Temperature-Based Replica Exchange.
    Lee MS; Olson MA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2010 Aug; 6(8):2477-87. PubMed ID: 26613500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of statistical potentials to protein structure refinement from low resolution ab initio models.
    Lu H; Skolnick J
    Biopolymers; 2003 Dec; 70(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 14648767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural refinement of protein segments containing secondary structure elements: Local sampling, knowledge-based potentials, and clustering.
    Zhu J; Xie L; Honig B
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(2):463-79. PubMed ID: 16927337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.