These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [Re: Criteria-based diagnostics generate excessive and incorrect diagnoses]. Lien L; Johannessen JO Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Oct; 135(19):1712. PubMed ID: 26486657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Criteria-based diagnostics generate excessive and incorrect diagnoses. Gjerden P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Sep; 135(16):1437. PubMed ID: 26356450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Standards of manipulation diagnosis]. Nakayasu N Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 1997; 99(10):736-42. PubMed ID: 9465729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of social workers' and psychiatrists' GAF ratings. Kopera AA Psychiatr Serv; 2002 Oct; 53(10):1329-30; author reply 1330. PubMed ID: 12364693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Value and limits of the criteria and scale approach in clinical research in psychiatry]. Guelfi JD; Waintraub L Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1994 Feb; 152(2):108-13; discussion 113-4. PubMed ID: 8085701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of childhood mental disorder: diagnoses by Japanese psychologists. Hasui C; Sugiura T; Tanaka E; Sakamoto S; Sugawara M; Kitamura T; Aoki Y Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1999 Feb; 53(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 10201285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A suggestion for improvement of current psychiatric diagnostic systems. Martens WH Psychopathology; 2001; 34(4):217. PubMed ID: 11549934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. International variations in psychiatric diagnosis. Wing JK Triangle; 1973; 12(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 4577560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Phenomenology and clinometry]. Jonckheere P; Meire P Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1984 Jun; 142(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 6395749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological psychiatry audited. van Praag HM J Nerv Ment Dis; 1988 Apr; 176(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 3351497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Objectivity in clinical psychiatric research. Little JC Lancet; 1968 Nov; 2(7577):1072-5. PubMed ID: 4176879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Explanatory pluralism and patchy reductionism. Campbell WG; Pearce KI Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 162(12):2401; author reply 2401. PubMed ID: 16330622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of office-based psychiatric practice using a structured diagnostic interview to guide treatment. Lyketsos CG; Aritzi S; Lyketsos GC J Nerv Ment Dis; 1994 Dec; 182(12):720-3. PubMed ID: 7989918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardised rating scales in psychiatry: methodological basis, their possibilities and limitations and descriptions of important rating scales. Möller HJ World J Biol Psychiatry; 2009; 10(1):6-26. PubMed ID: 18663668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Progress toward achieving a common language in psychiatry, II: Results from the international field trials of the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for research for mental and behavioral disorders. Sartorius N; Ustün TB; Korten A; Cooper JE; van Drimmelen J Am J Psychiatry; 1995 Oct; 152(10):1427-37. PubMed ID: 7573580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New aspects of cognition domains and psychopathological measures in psychiatry. Reich-Erkelenz D; Schmitt A; Falkai P Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 264(8):647-9. PubMed ID: 25331428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]