150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26627764)
1. Combined neural and behavioural measures of temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2885-905. PubMed ID: 26627764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():363-71. PubMed ID: 23716242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
Botros A; Psarros C
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients.
Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1527-37. PubMed ID: 16583898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL
Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1472-1486. PubMed ID: 35139051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 21730858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.
Wu CC; Luo X
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 17(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 26691160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
Pieper SH; Bahmer A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
Clay KM; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
