167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26627851)
1. Physiological and transcriptional responses and cross protection of Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY2013 under acid stress.
Huang R; Pan M; Wan C; Shah NP; Tao X; Wei H
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Feb; 99(2):1002-1010. PubMed ID: 26627851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole genome and acid stress comparative transcriptome analysis of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZDY2013.
Peng L; Zhao K; Chen S; Ren Z; Wei H; Wan C
Arch Microbiol; 2021 Aug; 203(6):2795-2807. PubMed ID: 33725139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative proteomic analysis of three Lactobacillus plantarum strains under salt stress by iTRAQ.
Luo X; Li M; Zhang H; Yan D; Ji S; Wu R; Chen Y
J Sci Food Agric; 2021 Jun; 101(8):3457-3471. PubMed ID: 33270231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Salt Stress on Carbohydrate Metabolism of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917.
Wang P; Wu Z; Wu J; Pan D; Zeng X; Cheng K
Curr Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 73(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 27342422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcriptional Regulator AcrR Increases Ethanol Tolerance through Regulation of Fatty Acid Synthesis in
Yang X; Teng K; Li L; Su R; Zhang J; Ai G; Zhong J
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Nov; 85(22):. PubMed ID: 31519657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Short- and long-term adaptation to ethanol stress and its cross-protective consequences in Lactobacillus plantarum.
van Bokhorst-van de Veen H; Abee T; Tempelaars M; Bron PA; Kleerebezem M; Marco ML
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 77(15):5247-56. PubMed ID: 21705551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acid resistance and response to pH-induced stress in two Lactobacillus plantarum strains with probiotic potential.
Šeme H; Gjuračić K; Kos B; Fujs Š; Štempelj M; Petković H; Šušković J; Bogovič Matijašić B; Kosec G
Benef Microbes; 2015; 6(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 25380802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular adaptation of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 to gallic acid revealed by genome-scale transcriptomic signature and physiological analysis.
Reverón I; de las Rivas B; Matesanz R; Muñoz R; López de Felipe F
Microb Cell Fact; 2015 Oct; 14():160. PubMed ID: 26453568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antagonistics of Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY2013 against Helicobacter pylori SS1 and its infection in vitro in human gastric epithelial AGS cells.
Zhao K; Xie Q; Xu D; Guo Y; Tao X; Wei H; Wan C
J Biosci Bioeng; 2018 Oct; 126(4):458-463. PubMed ID: 29699944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genotypic diversity of stress response in Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus paraplantarum and Lactobacillus pentosus.
Ricciardi A; Parente E; Guidone A; Ianniello RG; Zotta T; Abu Sayem SM; Varcamonti M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 157(2):278-85. PubMed ID: 22704047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY2013 and Bifidobacterium bifidum WBIN03 in relieving colitis by gut microbiota, immune, and anti-oxidative stress.
Wang Y; Guo Y; Chen H; Wei H; Wan C
Can J Microbiol; 2018 May; 64(5):327-337. PubMed ID: 29401402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metabolomics analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 adhesion activity under initial acid and alkali stress.
Wang W; He J; Pan D; Wu Z; Guo Y; Zeng X; Lian L
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196231. PubMed ID: 29795550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expression of the atpD gene in probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains under in vitro acidic conditions using RT-qPCR.
Duary RK; Batish VK; Grover S
Res Microbiol; 2010 Jun; 161(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 20416373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physiological and transcriptional response of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 to acid stress.
Broadbent JR; Larsen RL; Deibel V; Steele JL
J Bacteriol; 2010 May; 192(9):2445-58. PubMed ID: 20207759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serum Untargeted Metabolism Reveals the Mechanism of
Wan C; Chen S; Zhao K; Ren Z; Peng L; Xia H; Wei H; Yu B
Nutrients; 2021 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 34836175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Homology- and cross-resistance of Lactobacillus plantarum to acid and osmotic stress and the influence of induction conditions on its proliferation by RNA-Seq.
Wu J; Yan X; Weng P; Chen G; Wu Z
J Basic Microbiol; 2021 Jun; 61(6):576-590. PubMed ID: 33945164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response of Lactobacillus plantarum VAL6 to challenges of pH and sodium chloride stresses.
Nguyen PT; Nguyen TT; Vo TN; Nguyen TT; Hoang QK; Nguyen HT
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1301. PubMed ID: 33446763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interrelation between Tween and the membrane properties and high pressure tolerance of Lactobacillus plantarum.
Reitermayer D; Kafka TA; Lenz CA; Vogel RF
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 30001697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcriptome signatures of class I and III stress response deregulation in Lactobacillus plantarum reveal pleiotropic adaptation.
Van Bokhorst-van de Veen H; Bongers RS; Wels M; Bron PA; Kleerebezem M
Microb Cell Fact; 2013 Nov; 12():112. PubMed ID: 24238744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus plantarum strains on the intracellular pH of sessile and planktonic Listeria monocytogenes single cells.
Nielsen DS; Cho GS; Hanak A; Huch M; Franz CM; Arneborg N
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 141 Suppl 1():S53-9. PubMed ID: 20447709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
