These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26628886)

  • 21. Independent US panel fans debate on mammography.
    McLellan F
    Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9304):409. PubMed ID: 11844518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Informing the mammography coverage debate. Results of meta-analysis, computer modeling, and issue analysis.
    Simpson KN; Snyder LB
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(4):616-31. PubMed ID: 1838101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Controversies in mammography screening: let us not ignore science in this never-ending debate.
    Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1061-3. PubMed ID: 22144424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Healthy lifestyle behaviors and the periodicity of mammography screening in Brazilian women.
    Patrão AL; de Almeida MDCC; Matos SMA; Menezes G; Gabrielli L; Goes EF; Aquino EM
    Womens Health (Lond); 2021; 17():17455065211063294. PubMed ID: 34841999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of non-profits in the mammogram debate.
    Fernando J
    Yale J Biol Med; 2011 Mar; 84(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 21451782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The mammography screening debate: time to move on.
    Gelmon KA; Olivotto I
    Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9310):904-5. PubMed ID: 11918902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Women's participation in breast cancer screening in France--an ethical approach.
    Moutel G; Duchange N; Darquy S; de Montgolfier S; Papin-Lefebvre F; Jullian O; Viguier J; Sancho-Garnier H;
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Aug; 15():64. PubMed ID: 25127662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. US issues new guidelines as mammography debate continues.
    Josefson D
    BMJ; 2002 Mar; 324(7336):506. PubMed ID: 11872545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An overview of mammography: benefits and limitations.
    Smith RA
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2003 Apr; 1(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 19768884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammography at a crossroad. How do physicians reconcile conflicting study results with the biologic truths of breast cancer?
    Smith BL
    Postgrad Med; 2002 Nov; 112(5):11-2, 15. PubMed ID: 12462182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The value of mammography in patients up to the age of 35].
    Farrés MT; Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Metz V; Salomonowitz E
    Rofo; 1991 May; 154(5):560-2. PubMed ID: 1852050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advanced primary breast cancer: assessment at mammography of response to induction chemotherapy.
    Segel MC; Paulus DD; Hortobagyi GN
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3420282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lessons from the mammography screening controversy: can we improve the debate?
    Ransohoff DF; Harris RP
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Dec; 127(11):1029-34. PubMed ID: 9412285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of mammography trials renews debate on mortality reduction.
    Baltic S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Nov; 93(22):1678-9. PubMed ID: 11717322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The North Carolina Breast Cancer Screening Program: foundations and design of a model for reaching older, minority, rural women.
    Earp JA; Altpeter M; Mayne L; Viadro CI; O'Malley MS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1995 Jul; 35(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 7612907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dyslexia debated, then and now: a historical perspective on the dyslexia debate.
    Kirby P
    Oxf Rev Educ; 2020 Aug; 46(4):472-486. PubMed ID: 32939102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. American researchers question effect of Scandinavian mammography debate.
    Twombly R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(16):1216-7. PubMed ID: 17686816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case for.
    Warren R
    BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6654):969-70. PubMed ID: 3142571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammography screening for women under 50: women's response to medical controversy and changing practice guidelines.
    Aiken LS; Jackson KM; Lapin A
    Womens Health; 1998; 4(3):169-97. PubMed ID: 9787648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Women's health. Mammography: why is there a debate?
    Harv Health Lett; 2002 Jun; 27(8):4-5. PubMed ID: 12079814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.