132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26629101)
1. The dosimetric comparison of the radiotherapeutic plans between composite and synchronous planning approaches in sequential IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Zhou G; Sun Y; Qian J; Tian Y; Lu X
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(9):15975-82. PubMed ID: 26629101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT.
Lu SH; Cheng JC; Kuo SH; Lee JJ; Chen LH; Wu JK; Chen YH; Chen WY; Wen SY; Chong FC; Wu CJ; Wang CW
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Sep; 104(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 22236614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heart and Cardiac Substructure Dose Sparing in Synchronous Bilateral Breast Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Study of Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy.
Sun T; Lin X; Tong Y; Liu X; Pan L; Tao C; Duan J; Yin Y
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1456. PubMed ID: 31998635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
Qiu J; Lv B; Fu M; Wang X; Zheng X; Zhuo W
Head Neck; 2017 Dec; 39(12):2519-2527. PubMed ID: 28963789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A split-organ delineation approach for dose optimisation for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Chau RM; Leung SF; Kam MK; Cheung KY; Kwan WH; Yu KH; Chiu SK; Chan AT
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Mar; 20(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 18031999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma using simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) protocol: a comparison planning study between intensity modulated arc radiotherapy vs. intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Liu T; Chen J; Gong G; Zhang G; Bai T; Sun T; Lu J; Ma C; Yin Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Oct; 11(5):415-20. PubMed ID: 22568626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dosimetric advantage over conventional plans and feasibility of dose escalation.
Kam MK; Chau RM; Suen J; Choi PH; Teo PM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 May; 56(1):145-57. PubMed ID: 12694833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic IMRT treatment planning through fluence prediction and plan fine-tuning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Cai W; Ding S; Li H; Zhou X; Dou W; Zhou L; Song T; Li Y
Radiat Oncol; 2024 Mar; 19(1):39. PubMed ID: 38509540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of standard three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost schedule (sequential IMRT plan) with simultaneous integrated boost-IMRT (SIB IMRT) treatment plan in patients with localized carcinoma prostate.
Bansal A; Kapoor R; Singh SK; Kumar N; Oinam AS; Sharma SC
Indian J Urol; 2012 Jul; 28(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 23204659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using simultaneous integrated boost for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma.
Johnston M; Clifford S; Bromley R; Back M; Oliver L; Eade T
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 Oct; 23(8):503-11. PubMed ID: 21397477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage glottic cancers with and without the air cavity in the planning target volume.
Asher D; Amestoy W; Studenski MT; Samuels SE; Abramowitz MC; Freedman LM; Elsayyad N; Samuels MA
Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):405-408. PubMed ID: 30928177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric Comparison between Single and Dual Arc-Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using a Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique.
Radhakrishnan S; Chandrasekaran A; Sarma Y; Balakrishnan S; Nandigam J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 May; 18(5):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 28612593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative dosimetric study of two strategies of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer.
Chen SW; Yang SN; Liang JA; Shiau AC; Lin FJ
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 16275564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.
Dogan N; King S; Emami B; Mohideen N; Mirkovic N; Leybovich LB; Sethi A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Dec; 57(5):1480-91. PubMed ID: 14630288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
