BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26629886)

  • 1. Force-Field Induced Bias in the Structure of Aβ21-30: A Comparison of OPLS, AMBER, CHARMM, and GROMOS Force Fields.
    Smith MD; Rao JS; Segelken E; Cruz L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Dec; 55(12):2587-95. PubMed ID: 26629886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Dependence of Amyloid-β Dynamics on Protein Force Fields and Water Models.
    Somavarapu AK; Kepp KP
    Chemphyschem; 2015 Oct; 16(15):3278-89. PubMed ID: 26256268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of Aβ Monomers through the Convergence of Ensemble Properties among Simulations with Multiple Force Fields.
    Rosenman DJ; Wang C; García AE
    J Phys Chem B; 2016 Jan; 120(2):259-77. PubMed ID: 26562747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of different force fields on the structural character of α synuclein β-hairpin peptide (35-56) in aqueous environment.
    Kundu S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Feb; 36(2):302-317. PubMed ID: 28024449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of biomolecular force fields for molecular dynamics simulations in a protein crystal.
    Hu Z; Jiang J
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Jan; 31(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 19479737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
    Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conformational Dynamics of Two Natively Unfolded Fragment Peptides: Comparison of the AMBER and CHARMM Force Fields.
    Chen W; Shi C; MacKerell AD; Shen J
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(25):7902-10. PubMed ID: 26020564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why the OPLS-AA force field cannot produce the β-hairpin structure of H1 peptide in solution when comparing with the GROMOS 43A1 force field?
    Cao Z; Liu L; Wang J
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Dec; 29(3):527-39. PubMed ID: 22066538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Updated Test of AMBER Force Fields and Implicit Solvent Models in Predicting the Secondary Structure of Helical, β-Hairpin, and Intrinsically Disordered Peptides.
    Maffucci I; Contini A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Feb; 12(2):714-27. PubMed ID: 26784558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing atomistic molecular mechanics force fields for a difficult target: a case study on the Alzheimer's amyloid β-peptide.
    Gerben SR; Lemkul JA; Brown AM; Bevan DR
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2014; 32(11):1817-32. PubMed ID: 24028075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-Resolution Structures of the Amyloid-β 1-42 Dimers from the Comparison of Four Atomistic Force Fields.
    Man VH; Nguyen PH; Derreumaux P
    J Phys Chem B; 2017 Jun; 121(24):5977-5987. PubMed ID: 28538095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the Conformational Ensemble of Alzheimer's Aβ10-40 Peptide Force Field Dependent?
    Siwy CM; Lockhart C; Klimov DK
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005314. PubMed ID: 28085875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
    Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the strengths of salt bridges in the CutA1 protein using molecular dynamic simulations: a comparison of different force fields.
    Matsuura Y; Joti Y; Bagautdinov B; Yutani K
    FEBS Open Bio; 2019 Nov; 9(11):1939-1956. PubMed ID: 31509647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of two different force fields on structural and thermodynamics character of H1 peptide via molecular dynamics simulations.
    Cao Z; Wang J
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2010 Apr; 27(5):651-61. PubMed ID: 20085382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary Structure of Rat and Human Amylin across Force Fields.
    Hoffmann KQ; McGovern M; Chiu CC; de Pablo JJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134091. PubMed ID: 26221949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Folding Atomistic Proteins in Explicit Solvent Using Simulated Tempering.
    Zhang T; Nguyen PH; Nasica-Labouze J; Mu Y; Derreumaux P
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(23):6941-51. PubMed ID: 25985144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of water models on binding affinity: evidence from all-atom simulation of binding of tamiflu to A/H5N1 neuraminidase.
    Nguyen TT; Viet MH; Li MS
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():536084. PubMed ID: 24672329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of force fields for Alzheimer's A β42: A case study for intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Carballo-Pacheco M; Strodel B
    Protein Sci; 2017 Feb; 26(2):174-185. PubMed ID: 27727496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of the structural ensembles of p53 TAD2 by molecular dynamics simulations with different force fields.
    Ouyang Y; Zhao L; Zhang Z
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 20(13):8676-8684. PubMed ID: 29537020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.