These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
13. Role of streaming potential on pulsating mass flow rate control in combined electroosmotic and pressure-driven microfluidic devices. Chakraborty J; Ray S; Chakraborty S Electrophoresis; 2012 Feb; 33(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 22212910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring microchannel electroosmotic mobility and zeta potential by the current monitoring method. Shao C; Devoe DL Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 949():55-63. PubMed ID: 23329435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of varying electroosmotic flow on the effective diffusion in electric field gradient separations. Maynes D; Tenny J; Webbd BW; Lee ML Electrophoresis; 2008 Feb; 29(3):549-60. PubMed ID: 18200632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A portable pressure pump for microfluidic lab-on-a-chip systems using a porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sponge. Cha KJ; Kim DS Biomed Microdevices; 2011 Oct; 13(5):877-83. PubMed ID: 21698383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Numerical analysis of field-modulated electroosmotic flows in microchannels with arbitrary numbers and configurations of discrete electrodes. Chao K; Chen B; Wu J Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Dec; 12(6):959-66. PubMed ID: 20668948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concentration gradient focusing and separation in a silica nanofluidic channel with a non-uniform electroosmotic flow. Hsu WL; Harvie DJ; Davidson MR; Jeong H; Goldys EM; Inglis DW Lab Chip; 2014 Sep; 14(18):3539-49. PubMed ID: 25027204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]