These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26630072)

  • 1. Performance of a direct detection camera for off-axis electron holography.
    Chang SLY; Dwyer C; Barthel J; Boothroyd CB; Dunin-Borkowski RE
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Feb; 161():90-97. PubMed ID: 26630072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational evaluation of sparse coding on off-axis electron holograms: comparison between charge-coupled device and direct-detection device cameras.
    Anada S; Nomura Y; Hirayama T; Yamamoto K
    Microscopy (Oxf); 2022 Jan; 71(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 34410409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimising electron holography in the presence of partial coherence and instrument instabilities.
    Chang SLY; Dwyer C; Boothroyd CB; Dunin-Borkowski RE
    Ultramicroscopy; 2015 Apr; 151():37-45. PubMed ID: 25511930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise estimation for off-axis electron holography.
    Röder F; Lubk A; Wolf D; Niermann T
    Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Sep; 144():32-42. PubMed ID: 24821224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Movies of cellular and sub-cellular motion by digital holographic microscopy.
    Mann CJ; Yu L; Kim MK
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Mar; 5():21. PubMed ID: 16556319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of localized visibility in off-axis electron holography.
    McLeod RA; Kupsta M; Malac M
    Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Mar; 138():4-12. PubMed ID: 24370949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tutorial on off-axis electron holography.
    Lehmann M; Lichte H
    Microsc Microanal; 2002 Dec; 8(6):447-66. PubMed ID: 12533207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise in off-axis type holograms including reconstruction and CCD camera parameters.
    Voelkl E
    Ultramicroscopy; 2010 Feb; 110(3):199-210. PubMed ID: 20022178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of detection limits of direct-counting CMOS and CCD cameras in EELS experiments.
    Haruta M; Kikkawa J; Kimoto K; Kurata H
    Ultramicroscopy; 2022 Oct; 240():113577. PubMed ID: 35728341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phase detection limits in off-axis electron holography from pixelated detectors: gain variations, geometric distortion and failure of reference-hologram correction.
    Hÿtch M; Gatel C
    Microscopy (Oxf); 2021 Feb; 70(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 32744626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospects for quantitative and time-resolved double and continuous exposure off-axis electron holography.
    Migunov V; Dwyer C; Boothroyd CB; Pozzi G; Dunin-Borkowski RE
    Ultramicroscopy; 2017 Jul; 178():48-61. PubMed ID: 27638333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electron image contrast analysis of mosaicity in rutile nanocrystals using direct electron detection.
    Yoon A; Shao YT; Howe J; Zuo JM
    Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv; 2020 Nov; 76(Pt 6):687-697. PubMed ID: 33125352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electron holography with a Cs-corrected transmission electron microscope.
    Geiger D; Lichte H; Linck M; Lehmann M
    Microsc Microanal; 2008 Feb; 14(1):68-81. PubMed ID: 18096096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Photon-counting 3D integral imaging with less than a single photon per pixel on average using a statistical model of the EM-CCD camera.
    Hotaka H; O'Connor T; Ohsuka S; Javidi B
    Opt Lett; 2020 Apr; 45(8):2327-2330. PubMed ID: 32287225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct Detection Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy: A Method to Push the Limits of Resolution and Sensitivity.
    Hart JL; Lang AC; Leff AC; Longo P; Trevor C; Twesten RD; Taheri ML
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):8243. PubMed ID: 28811485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multi-mode digital holographic microscope.
    Flewellen JL; Zaid IM; Berry RM
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2019 Feb; 90(2):023705. PubMed ID: 30831696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-speed line-field confocal holographic microscope for quantitative phase imaging.
    Liu C; Knitter S; Cong Z; Sencan I; Cao H; Choma MA
    Opt Express; 2016 May; 24(9):9251-65. PubMed ID: 27137541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phase measurement error in summation of electron holography series.
    McLeod RA; Bergen M; Malac M
    Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Jun; 141():38-50. PubMed ID: 24713344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative Mapping of the Charge Density in a Monolayer of MoS
    Boureau V; Sklenard B; McLeod R; Ovchinnikov D; Dumcenco D; Kis A; Cooper D
    ACS Nano; 2020 Jan; 14(1):524-530. PubMed ID: 31820927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum aberration coefficients for recording high-resolution off-axis holograms in a Cs-corrected TEM.
    Linck M
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Jan; 124():77-87. PubMed ID: 23142748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.