These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease. Zigler JE; Delamarter RB J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 23082846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Final Long-Term Reporting from a Randomized Controlled IDE Trial for Lumbar Artificial Discs in Single-Level Degenerative Disc Disease: 7-Year Results. Radcliff K; Zigler J; Braxton E; Buttermann G; Coric D; Derman P; Garcia R; Jorgensen A; Ferko NC; Situ A; Yue J Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):612-632. PubMed ID: 34266934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Aesculap Implant Systems activl Artificial Disc for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Shein D; Shue J; Girardi F Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016 Dec; 13(12):1069-1072. PubMed ID: 27807981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion. Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study. Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH; Schranck FW; Copay AG J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):347-356. PubMed ID: 31100723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months. Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute. Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of 1- and 2-Level Total Disc Replacement: Four-Year Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter IDE Clinical Trial. Bae HW; Kim KD; Nunley PD; Jackson RJ; Hisey MS; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Peterson DL; Stokes JM; Araghi A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):759-66. PubMed ID: 25785955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mid- to long-term results of total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review. Cui XD; Li HT; Zhang W; Zhang LL; Luo ZP; Yang HL J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 13(1):326. PubMed ID: 30585142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Blumenthal S; McAfee PC; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH; Geisler FH; Holt RT; Garcia R; Regan JJ; Ohnmeiss DD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]