These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26631196)

  • 1. Evaluation of Preoperative Implant Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Hamilton MA; Polakovic S; Saadi P; Jones RB; Parsons IM; Cheung EV
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S47-51. PubMed ID: 26631196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distribution of Glenoid Implant Options for Correcting Deformities Using a Preoperative Planning Tool.
    Greene A; Jones RB; Wright TW; Parsons IM; Saadi P; Cheung EV; Polakovic S; Hamilton MA
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S52-6. PubMed ID: 26631197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
    Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial.
    Hendel MD; Bryan JA; Barsoum WK; Rodriguez EJ; Brems JJ; Evans PJ; Iannotti JP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2167-75. PubMed ID: 23224387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning.
    Iannotti J; Baker J; Rodriguez E; Brems J; Ricchetti E; Mesiha M; Bryan J
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(9):e71. PubMed ID: 24806017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Version Correction via Eccentric Reaming Compromises Remaining Bone Quality in B2 Glenoids: A Computational Study.
    Chen X; Reddy AS; Kontaxis A; Choi DS; Wright T; Dines DM; Warren RF; Berhouet J; Gulotta LV
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3090-3099. PubMed ID: 28948516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary Results of a Posterior Augmented Glenoid Compared to an all Polyethylene Standard Glenoid in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Wright TW; Grey SG; Roche CP; Wright L; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S79-85. PubMed ID: 26631201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone.
    Schoch BS; Haupt E; Leonor T; Farmer KW; Wright TW; King JJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2257-2263. PubMed ID: 32586595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of mixed-reality surgical navigation for glenoid axis pin placement in shoulder arthroplasty using a cadaveric model.
    Sanchez-Sotelo J; Berhouet J; Chaoui J; Freehill MT; Collin P; Warner J; Walch G; Athwal GS
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 May; 33(5):1177-1184. PubMed ID: 37890765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of glenoid deformity on glenoid component placement in primary shoulder arthroplasty.
    Iannotti JP; Greeson C; Downing D; Sabesan V; Bryan JA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jan; 21(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 21600787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study.
    Walch G; Vezeridis PS; Boileau P; Deransart P; Chaoui J
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Feb; 24(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 25183662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary Results of a Novel Hybrid Cage Glenoid Compared to an All-Polyethylene Glenoid in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Grey SG; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD; Friedman R; Roche CP
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S86-91. PubMed ID: 26631202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation of surgical glenoid resurfacing using three-dimensional computed tomography of the arthritic glenohumeral joint: the amount of glenoid retroversion that can be corrected.
    Nowak DD; Bahu MJ; Gardner TR; Dyrszka MD; Levine WN; Bigliani LU; Ahmad CS
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2009; 18(5):680-8. PubMed ID: 19487133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.
    Hartzler RU; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Werner BC; Romeo AA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):787-794. PubMed ID: 32650080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total Ankle Arthroplasty Accuracy and Reproducibility Using Preoperative CT Scan-Derived, Patient-Specific Guides.
    Berlet GC; Penner MJ; Lancianese S; Stemniski PM; Obert RM
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Jul; 35(7):665-76. PubMed ID: 24719401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study.
    Nashikkar PS; Scholes CJ; Haber MD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Dec; 28(12):e398-e409. PubMed ID: 31353300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
    Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of surgeon variability in preoperative planning of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
    Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2080-2088. PubMed ID: 32471752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the Anatomic Neck as an Accurate Landmark for Humeral Head Resurfacing Implant Height Placement.
    Chen EJ; Simovitch R; Savoie F; Noel CR
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S28-32. PubMed ID: 26631192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.