These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26631360)

  • 1. Does Nonadiabatic Transition State Theory Make Sense Without Decoherence?
    Jain A; Subotnik JE
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2015 Dec; 6(23):4809-14. PubMed ID: 26631360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface hopping outperforms secular Redfield theory when reorganization energies range from small to moderate (and nuclei are classical).
    Landry BR; Subotnik JE
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Mar; 142(10):104102. PubMed ID: 25770523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achieving partial decoherence in surface hopping through phase correction.
    Shenvi N; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(22):22A528. PubMed ID: 23249065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semiclassical calculation of nonadiabatic thermal rate constants: application to condensed phase reactions.
    Zhao Y; Li X; Zheng Z; Liang W
    J Chem Phys; 2006 Mar; 124(11):114508. PubMed ID: 16555902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the role of decoherence in condensed-phase nonadiabatic dynamics: a comparison of different mixed quantum/classical simulation algorithms for the excited hydrated electron.
    Larsen RE; Bedard-Hearn MJ; Schwartz BJ
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Oct; 110(40):20055-66. PubMed ID: 17020394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can surface hopping sans decoherence recover Marcus theory? Understanding the role of friction in a surface hopping view of electron transfer.
    Falk MJ; Landry BR; Subotnik JE
    J Phys Chem B; 2014 Jul; 118(28):8108-17. PubMed ID: 24745794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface hopping, transition state theory, and decoherence. II. Thermal rate constants and detailed balance.
    Jain A; Subotnik JE
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Oct; 143(13):134107. PubMed ID: 26450292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An efficient solution to the decoherence enhanced trivial crossing problem in surface hopping.
    Bai X; Qiu J; Wang L
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 148(10):104106. PubMed ID: 29544303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decoherence-induced surface hopping.
    Jaeger HM; Fischer S; Prezhdo OV
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(22):22A545. PubMed ID: 23249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Augmented Ehrenfest dynamics yields a rate for surface hopping.
    Subotnik JE
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Apr; 132(13):134112. PubMed ID: 20387926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communication: Standard surface hopping predicts incorrect scaling for Marcus' golden-rule rate: the decoherence problem cannot be ignored.
    Landry BR; Subotnik JE
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Nov; 135(19):191101. PubMed ID: 22112058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovering Marcus Theory Rates and Beyond without the Need for Decoherence Corrections: The Mapping Approach to Surface Hopping.
    Lawrence JE; Mannouch JR; Richardson JO
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2024 Jan; 15(3):707-716. PubMed ID: 38214476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fewest-switches surface hopping and decoherence in multiple dimensions.
    Subotnik JE
    J Phys Chem A; 2011 Nov; 115(44):12083-96. PubMed ID: 21995423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exact-Factorization-Based Surface Hopping for Multistate Dynamics.
    Vindel-Zandbergen P; Matsika S; Maitra NT
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2022 Feb; 13(7):1785-1790. PubMed ID: 35170972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonadiabatic surface hopping Herman-Kluk semiclassical initial value representation method revisited: applications to Tully's three model systems.
    Wu Y; Herman MF
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Oct; 123(14):144106. PubMed ID: 16238373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A variational surface hopping algorithm for the sub-Ohmic spin-boson model.
    Yao Y; Zhao Y
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Jul; 139(1):014102. PubMed ID: 23822288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mimicking classical noise in ion channels by quantum decoherence.
    Seifi M; Soltanmanesh A; Shafiee A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16130. PubMed ID: 38997398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mean-field dynamics with stochastic decoherence (MF-SD): a new algorithm for nonadiabatic mixed quantum/classical molecular-dynamics simulations with nuclear-induced decoherence.
    Bedard-Hearn MJ; Larsen RE; Schwartz BJ
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Dec; 123(23):234106. PubMed ID: 16392913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonadiabatic Excited-State Dynamics with Machine Learning.
    Dral PO; Barbatti M; Thiel W
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2018 Oct; 9(19):5660-5663. PubMed ID: 30200766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advanced Capabilities of the PYXAID Program: Integration Schemes, Decoherence Effects, Multiexcitonic States, and Field-Matter Interaction.
    Akimov AV; Prezhdo OV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Feb; 10(2):789-804. PubMed ID: 26580053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.