107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26632067)
21. Radiobiological and dosimetric analysis of daily megavoltage CT registration on adaptive radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy.
Mavroidis P; Su FC; Giantsoudi D; Stathakis S; Komisopoulos G; Shi C; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 10(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21214283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dosimetric adaptive IMRT driven by fiducial points.
Crijns W; Van Herck H; Defraene G; Van den Bergh L; Slagmolen P; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061716. PubMed ID: 24877811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose to water versus dose to medium in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4399-421. PubMed ID: 19550004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A robustness analysis method with fast estimation of dose uncertainty distributions for carbon-ion therapy treatment planning.
Sakama M; Kanematsu N; Inaniwa T
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(15):5818-36. PubMed ID: 27426737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correction method for the physical dose calculated using Clarkson integration at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak for asymmetric field in carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Tajiri M; Maeda T; Isobe Y; Tanimoto K; Shibayama K
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):985-8. PubMed ID: 25085450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biological dose calculation with Monte Carlo physics simulation for heavy-ion radiotherapy.
Kase Y; Kanematsu N; Kanai T; Matsufuji N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):N467-75. PubMed ID: 17148817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.
Stasi M; Bresciani S; Miranti A; Maggio A; Sapino V; Gabriele P
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34. PubMed ID: 23231310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Temporal lobe reactions after carbon ion radiation therapy: comparison of relative biological effectiveness-weighted tolerance doses predicted by local effect models I and IV.
Gillmann C; Jäkel O; Schlampp I; Karger CP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):1136-41. PubMed ID: 24661667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison between anisotropic analytical and multigrid superposition dose calculation algorithms in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Wu VW; Tse TK; Ho CL; Yeung EC
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 23535249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An on-line replanning method for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy.
Ahunbay EE; Peng C; Godley A; Schultz C; Li XA
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4776-90. PubMed ID: 19928108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetric impact of different CT datasets for stereotactic treatment planning using 3D conformal radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Oechsner M; Odersky L; Berndt J; Combs SE; Wilkens JJ; Duma MN
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Dec; 10():249. PubMed ID: 26626865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer.
Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Price R; McNeeley S; Qin L; Wang L; Xiong W; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 15798261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Design of ridge filters for spread-out Bragg peaks with Monte Carlo simulation in carbon ion therapy.
Sakama M; Kanai T; Kase Y; Yusa K; Tashiro M; Torikai K; Shimada H; Yamada S; Ohno T; Nakano T
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6615-33. PubMed ID: 23022653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of lung tumors: a comparison of absolute dose and dose distribution between pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms based on actual patient CT scans.
Chen H; Lohr F; Fritz P; Wenz F; Dobler B; Lorenz F; Mühlnickel W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):955-63. PubMed ID: 20171796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Test of the nuclear interaction model in SHIELD-HIT and comparison to energy distributions from GEANT4.
Henkner K; Sobolevsky N; Jäkel O; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):N509-17. PubMed ID: 19864697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Variation in patient position and impact on carbon-ion scanning beam distribution during prostate treatment.
Mori S; Inaniwa T; Miki K; Tanimoto K; Tajiri M; Kuroiwa D; Nakao M; Shiraishi Y; Shibayama K; Tsuji H
Br J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 88(1051):20140623. PubMed ID: 25950822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Initial implementation of the conversion from the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density in tissue inhomogeneity corrections: an anthropomorphic phantom study of radiotherapy treatment planning.
Tsukihara M; Noto Y; Sasamoto R; Hayakawa T; Saito M
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1378-88. PubMed ID: 25735292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT relative to bulk density assignment-based magnetic resonance-only approaches for prostate radiotherapy.
Kim J; Garbarino K; Schultz L; Levin K; Movsas B; Siddiqui MS; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst C
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Nov; 10():239. PubMed ID: 26597251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
