358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26632072)
1. A 1.5 T transverse magnetic field in radiotherapy of rectal cancer: Impact on the dose distribution.
Uilkema S; van der Heide U; Sonke JJ; Moreau M; van Triest B; Nijkamp J
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7182-9. PubMed ID: 26632072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Compensating for the impact of non-stationary spherical air cavities on IMRT dose delivery in transverse magnetic fields.
Bol GH; Lagendijk JJ; Raaymakers BW
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):755-68. PubMed ID: 25559321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing localized dosimetric effects due to unplanned gas cavities during pelvic MR-guided radiotherapy using Monte Carlo simulations.
Shortall J; Vasquez Osorio E; Chuter R; McWilliam A; Choudhury A; Kirkby K; Mackay R; van Herk M
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5807-5815. PubMed ID: 31600837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Online adaptive radiotherapy compared to plan selection for rectal cancer: quantifying the benefit.
de Jong R; Crama KF; Visser J; van Wieringen N; Wiersma J; Geijsen ED; Bel A
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):162. PubMed ID: 32641080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of varying air cavity on planning dosimetry for rectum patients treated on a 1.5 T hybrid MR-linac system.
Godoy Scripes P; Subashi E; Burleson S; Liang J; Romesser P; Crane C; Mechalakos J; Hunt M; Tyagi N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 21(7):144-152. PubMed ID: 32445292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Dosimetric Analysis of Preoperative Intensity-modulated and Image-guided Radiation Therapy with and without Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Yang Y; Feng L; Wang Y; Ge R; Gong H; Xie C; Wang J; Chen J; Lan Y; Ma L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 24988052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterizing local dose perturbations due to gas cavities in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.
Shortall J; Vasquez Osorio E; Chuter R; Green A; McWilliam A; Kirkby K; Mackay R; van Herk M
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2484-2494. PubMed ID: 32144781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between pelvic organ-at-risk dose and clinical target volume in postprostatectomy patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Stanic S; Mathai M; Cui J; Purdy JA; Valicenti RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1897-902. PubMed ID: 21536391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric and radiobiological consequences of computed tomography-guided adaptive strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of the prostate.
Battista JJ; Johnson C; Turnbull D; Kempe J; Bzdusek K; Van Dyk J; Bauman G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 23978708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rectal wall sparing by dosimetric effect of rectal balloon used during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.
Teh BS; Dong L; McGary JE; Mai WY; Grant W; Butler EB
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15749008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue-air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons.
Raaijmakers AJ; Raaymakers BW; Lagendijk JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1363-76. PubMed ID: 15798329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic variations due to radical prostatectomy. Impact on target volume definition and dose-volume parameters of rectum and bladder.
Sanguineti G; Castellone P; Foppiano F; Franzone P; Marcenaro M; Tognoni P; Bolognesi A; Ceresoli GL; Fiorino C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Sep; 180(9):563-72. PubMed ID: 15378187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
Cozzi L; Dinshaw KA; Shrivastava SK; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Deshpande DD; Jamema SV; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric effect of small bowel oral contrast on conventional radiation therapy, linear accelerator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy, and helical tomotherapy plans for rectal cancer.
Joseph K; Liu D; Severin D; Dickey M; Polkosnik LA; Warkentin H; Mihai A; Ghosh S; Field C
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(2):e95-102. PubMed ID: 25413403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery.
Ghilezan M; Yan D; Liang J; Jaffray D; Wong J; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1602-10. PubMed ID: 15590192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Analysis of interfractional errors and acute toxicity.
Rudat V; Nour A; Hammoud M; Alaradi A; Mohammed A
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Feb; 192(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 26545764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of dose painting of lung tumours using alanine/EPR dosimetry.
Knudtsen IS; Svestad JG; Skaug Sande EP; Rekstad BL; Rødal J; van Elmpt W; Öllers M; Hole EO; Malinen E
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(6):2243-54. PubMed ID: 26913997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
