These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26632232)

  • 1. Digitization of dental alginate impression: Three-dimensional evaluation of point cloud.
    Kim SR; Lee WS; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(6):835-40. PubMed ID: 26632232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
    Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensional accuracy of digital dental models from cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions according to time elapsed after the impressions.
    Lee SM; Hou Y; Cho JH; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 26827986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions.
    Cesur MG; Omurlu IK; Ozer T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1175-1181. PubMed ID: 29072243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.
    Burzynski JA; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Fields HW; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 29602345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical evaluation of two types of fixed partial denture impressions].
    Shi LS; Wang LK; Zhang XJ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 25(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 18072566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of Disinfectants on Antimicrobial and Physical Properties of Dental Impression Materials.
    Demajo JK; Cassar V; Farrugia C; Millan-Sango D; Sammut C; Valdramidis V; Camilleri J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 26757331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique.
    Ratnaweera PM; Yoshida K; Miura H; Kohta A; Tsuchihira K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Sep; 50(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15074361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners.
    Jeon JH; Choi BY; Kim CM; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):549-53. PubMed ID: 26182854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of two different disinfectants on dimensional stability of newer alginate impression materials over five days.
    Ambrose PK; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Dec; 19(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 22645797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional accuracy of jaw scans performed on alginate impressions or stone models: A practice-oriented study.
    Vogel AB; Kilic F; Schmidt F; Rübel S; Lapatki BG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jul; 76(4):351-65. PubMed ID: 26123733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [EVALUATION OF CHANGES OF GEOMETRICAL PARAMETERS OF ALGINATE DENTAL IMPRESSIONS DUE TO THE INFLUENCE OF CHEMICAL AND MICROWAVE DISINFECTION METHOD USING 3D TECHNOLOGIES].
    Nespraydko VP; Shevchuk VA; Michaylov AA; Lyseyko NV
    Lik Sprava; 2015; (7-8):117-23. PubMed ID: 27491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of disinfection of combined agar/alginate impressions on the dimensional accuracy of stone casts.
    Hiraguchi H; Nakagawa H; Kaketani M; Hirose H; Nishiyama M
    Dent Mater J; 2007 May; 26(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 17694758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of disinfecting alginate impressions on the scratch hardness of stone models.
    Hiraguchi H; Nakagawa H; Wakashima M; Miyanaga K; Saigo M; Nishiyama M
    Dent Mater J; 2006 Mar; 25(1):172-6. PubMed ID: 16706314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
    DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.