These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26632900)

  • 1. Refractive Results Using a New Optical Biometry Device: Comparison With Ultrasound Biometry Data.
    Aktas S; Aktas H; Tetikoglu M; Sagdk HM; Özcura F
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Dec; 94(48):e2169. PubMed ID: 26632900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
    Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster).
    Ha A; Wee WR; Kim MK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 29770644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.
    Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
    Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
    An Y; Kang EK; Kim H; Kang MJ; Byun YS; Joo CK
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30678658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
    Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparision of two new optical biometry devices with an ultrasonic immersion biometer].
    Chiseliţă D; Cantemir A; Gălăţanu C; Irod A
    Oftalmologia; 2011; 55(4):104-10. PubMed ID: 22642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
    Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500.
    Reitblat O; Levy A; Kleinmann G; Assia EI
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Jul; 32(7):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 29527012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in eyes with short and long axial lengths.
    Karabela Y; Eliacik M; Kaya F
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 16():96. PubMed ID: 27391470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative measurements of optical low-coherence reflectometry biometry and assessment of its refractive predictability.
    Akalın İ; Tüfek M; Türkyılmaz M; Öztürk F
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 39(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 29931570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison between Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometry and OcuScan RXP contact biometry for task delegation].
    El Chehab H; Giraud JM; Le Corre A; Chave N; Durand F; Kuter S; Ract-Madoux G; Swalduz B; Mourgues G; Dot C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Mar; 34(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 21257228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
    Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement of IOL power and axial length obtained by IOLMaster 500 vs IOLMaster 500 with Sonolink connection.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Nantasri P; Chongchareon M; Chonpimai P
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 251(4):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23314479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20362858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of Lenstar and IOLMaster for intraocular lens power calculation].
    Huang JH; Yang X; Wang QM; Cheng SM; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 48(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 23302275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.