BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26633042)

  • 1. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
    Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mortality Rates in Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Behbehani S; Suarez-Salvador E; Buras M; Magtibay P; Magrina J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):603-612.e1. PubMed ID: 31627007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-port approach to benign gynecologic pathology. A review.
    Carbonnel M; Revaux A; Frydman R; Yazigi A; Ayoubi JM
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 25714874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
    Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: A systematic review.
    Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Boulus S; Amit A; Lowenstein L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Dec; 231():1-7. PubMed ID: 30317138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.
    Moon AS; Garofalo J; Koirala P; Vu MT; Chuang L
    Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Apr; 100(2):445-460. PubMed ID: 32169189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
    Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy.
    Buderath P; Kimmig R
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26605432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Gynecological Cancer: Conventional Laparoscopy and/or Robot-Assisted Surgery.
    Minig L; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Zanagnolo V
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Mar; 27(3):562-574. PubMed ID: 28187093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
    Zechmeister JR; Pua TL; Boyd LR; Blank SV; Curtin JP; Pothuri B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):194.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25108142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Essential Elements of a Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    Simpson KM; Advincula AP
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2016 Sep; 43(3):479-93. PubMed ID: 27521880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic surgery in gynecology: review of literature.
    Rivas-López R; Sandoval-García-Travesí FA
    Cir Cir; 2020; 88(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 31967609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
    Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
    Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update.
    Bretschneider CE; Jallad K; Paraiso MFR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 28177208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V;
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.
    Varghese A; Doglioli M; Fader AN
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 62(4):733-748. PubMed ID: 31524659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Gynecologic robotic surgery and our initial experience].
    Pilka R; Dzvincuk P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2010 Dec; 75(6):512-7. PubMed ID: 27534006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.