These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26633091)

  • 1. Heterotopic ossification associated with myelopathy following cervical disc prosthesis implantation.
    Wenger M; Markwalder TM
    J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 26():154-6. PubMed ID: 26633091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass.
    Jin YJ; Park SB; Kim MJ; Kim KJ; Kim HJ
    Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):408-20. PubMed ID: 23332520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant failure of Bryan cervical disc due to broken polyurethane sheath: a case report.
    Fan H; Wu S; Wu Z; Wang Z; Guo Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E814-6. PubMed ID: 22210017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-level cervical total disc replacement for adjacent segment disease: is it a useful treatment? Description of late onset heterotopic ossification and review of the literature.
    Barbagallo GM; Certo F; Visocchi M; Sciacca G; Albanese V
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(1 Suppl):15-23. PubMed ID: 24825036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Cervical Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in China.
    Zhao Y; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Pan S; Zhou F; Liu Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 26751058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of effectiveness and incidence of heterotopic ossification after single-level Bryan cervical artificial disc replacement].
    Liu W; Zhu B; Liu X; Sun Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 26(6):699-702. PubMed ID: 22792767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.
    Heidecke V; Burkert W; Brucke M; Rainov NG
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2008 May; 150(5):453-9; discussion 459. PubMed ID: 18421412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. Surgical technique.
    Buchowski JM; Anderson PA; Sekhon L; Riew KD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 91 Suppl 2():223-32. PubMed ID: 19805586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Follow-up study on the motion range after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.
    Yang S; Hu Y; Zhao J; He X; Liu Y; Xu W; Du J; Fu D
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2007 Apr; 27(2):176-8. PubMed ID: 17497290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study.
    Wigfield CC; Gill SS; Nelson RJ; Metcalf NH; Robertson JT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2446-52. PubMed ID: 12435973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-level artificial disc placement for spondylotic cervical myelopathy.
    Sekhon LH
    J Clin Neurosci; 2004 May; 11(4):412-5. PubMed ID: 15080959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Solid radiographic fusion with a nonconstrained device 5 years after cervical arthroplasty.
    Heary RF; Goldstein IM; Getto KM; Agarwal N
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):951-5. PubMed ID: 25303618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Yi S; Kim KN; Yang MS; Yang JW; Kim H; Ha Y; Yoon DH; Shin HC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(16):1556-61. PubMed ID: 20581764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty.
    Duggal N; Pickett GE; Mitsis DK; Keller JL
    Neurosurg Focus; 2004 Sep; 17(3):E9. PubMed ID: 15636565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid Corpectomy and Disc Arthroplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Disc Herniation.
    Chang HC; Tu TH; Chang HK; Wu JC; Fay LY; Chang PY; Wu CL; Huang WC; Cheng H
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 95():22-30. PubMed ID: 27474455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Cervical Disk Arthroplasty to Treat Noncontiguous Cervical Disk Herniations.
    Brusko GD; Luther E; Levi AD
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():163-166. PubMed ID: 31606498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Thaler M; Hartmann S; Gstöttner M; Lechner R; Gabl M; Bach C
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):759-65. PubMed ID: 23184184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone loss of the superior adjacent vertebral body immediately posterior to the anterior flange of Bryan cervical disc.
    Kim SH; Chung YS; Ropper AE; Min KH; Ahn TK; Won KS; Shin DA; Han IB
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2872-9. PubMed ID: 25787945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Best NM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.
    Goffin J; van Loon J; Van Calenbergh F; Lipscomb B
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Mar; 12(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 20192625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.