BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26633130)

  • 1. Fast and easy phosphopeptide fractionation by combinatorial ERLIC-SCX solid-phase extraction for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis.
    Zarei M; Sprenger A; Rackiewicz M; Dengjel J
    Nat Protoc; 2016 Jan; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 26633130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid combinatorial ERLIC-SCX solid-phase extraction for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis.
    Zarei M; Sprenger A; Gretzmeier C; Dengjel J
    J Proteome Res; 2013 Dec; 12(12):5989-95. PubMed ID: 24144214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Highly sensitive phosphoproteomics by tailoring solid-phase extraction to electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
    Loroch S; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
    Anal Chem; 2015 Feb; 87(3):1596-604. PubMed ID: 25405705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combinatorial use of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) and strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis.
    Zarei M; Sprenger A; Gretzmeier C; Dengjel J
    J Proteome Res; 2012 Aug; 11(8):4269-76. PubMed ID: 22768876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different fractionation strategies for in-depth phosphoproteomics by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
    Yeh TT; Ho MY; Chen WY; Hsu YC; Ku WC; Tseng HW; Chen ST; Chen SF
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2019 Jun; 411(15):3417-3424. PubMed ID: 31011783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and application of a phosphoproteomic method using electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), IMAC, and LC-MS/MS analysis to study Marek's Disease Virus infection.
    Chien KY; Liu HC; Goshe MB
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Sep; 10(9):4041-53. PubMed ID: 21736374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) versus SCX-IMAC-based methods for phosphopeptide isolation/enrichment.
    Gan CS; Guo T; Zhang H; Lim SK; Sze SK
    J Proteome Res; 2008 Nov; 7(11):4869-77. PubMed ID: 18828627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ERLIC-TiO2, HILIC-TiO2, and SCX-TiO2 for global phosphoproteomics approaches.
    Zarei M; Sprenger A; Metzger F; Gretzmeier C; Dengjel J
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Aug; 10(8):3474-83. PubMed ID: 21682340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics.
    Batth TS; Francavilla C; Olsen JV
    J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):6176-86. PubMed ID: 25338131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finding the Sweet Spot in ERLIC Mobile Phase for Simultaneous Enrichment of N-Glyco and Phosphopeptides.
    Cui Y; Yang K; Tabang DN; Huang J; Tang W; Li L
    J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2491-2501. PubMed ID: 31286442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anion-exchange chromatography of phosphopeptides: weak anion exchange versus strong anion exchange and anion-exchange chromatography versus electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
    Alpert AJ; Hudecz O; Mechtler K
    Anal Chem; 2015; 87(9):4704-11. PubMed ID: 25827581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) versus strong cation exchange (SCX) for fractionation of iTRAQ-labeled peptides.
    Hao P; Qian J; Ren Y; Sze SK
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5568-74. PubMed ID: 22014306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complementary workflow for global phosphoproteome analysis.
    Li QR; Ning ZB; Yang XL; Wu JR; Zeng R
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Nov; 33(22):3291-8. PubMed ID: 23097065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehensive profiling of phosphopeptides based on anion exchange followed by flow-through enrichment with titanium dioxide (AFET).
    Nie S; Dai J; Ning ZB; Cao XJ; Sheng QH; Zeng R
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Sep; 9(9):4585-94. PubMed ID: 20681634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TiO
    Ren L; Li C; Shao W; Lin W; He F; Jiang Y
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Jan; 17(1):710-721. PubMed ID: 29116813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid Shotgun Phosphoproteomics Analysis.
    Carrera M; Cañas B; Lopez-Ferrer D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2259():259-268. PubMed ID: 33687721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hydrophilic Carboxyl Cotton Chelator for Titanium(IV) Immobilization and Its Application as Novel Fibrous Sorbent for Rapid Enrichment of Phosphopeptides.
    He XM; Chen X; Zhu GT; Wang Q; Yuan BF; Feng YQ
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Aug; 7(31):17356-62. PubMed ID: 26207954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enrichment Strategies in Phosphoproteomics.
    Leitner A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1355():105-21. PubMed ID: 26584921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tip-Based Fractionation of Batch-Enriched Phosphopeptides Facilitates Easy and Robust Phosphoproteome Analysis.
    Dehghani A; Gödderz M; Winter D
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Jan; 17(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 29083192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidimensional electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) for quantitative analysis of the proteome and phosphoproteome in clinical and biomedical research.
    Loroch S; Schommartz T; Brune W; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1854(5):460-8. PubMed ID: 25619855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.