These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26633598)
1. Risk of bias assessment should not go beyond reporting assessment. Faggion CM J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():126-7. PubMed ID: 26633598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs]. Timmer A Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. White hat bias: a threat to the integrity of scientific reporting. Cope MB; Allison DB Acta Paediatr; 2010 Nov; 99(11):1615-7. PubMed ID: 21039822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What are the implications of optimism bias in clinical research? Chalmers I; Matthews R Lancet; 2006 Feb; 367(9509):449-50. PubMed ID: 16473106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should we trust abstracts from pain conferences? Publication bias and discordance between abstract and publication. Puljak L; Saric L Pain Manag; 2020 Jan; 10(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 31852381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist. Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breaching the contract: the ethics of nonpublication of research studies. Dowd MD Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Oct; 158(10):1014-5. PubMed ID: 15466692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why most published meta-analysis findings are false. Doleman B; Williams JP; Lund J Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Sep; 23(9):925-928. PubMed ID: 31240417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Transparency in clinical research: registration of clinical trials and publication of results]. Pérez-Mañá C; Llonch C; Farré M Med Clin (Barc); 2012 Dec; 139(13):593-7. PubMed ID: 22982127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. We need access to all data from all clinical trials. Gøtzsche PC Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Oct; 2011(12):ED000035. PubMed ID: 22161455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Publish or be damned. Vines G New Sci; 1997 Sep; 155(2099):53. PubMed ID: 16127834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Don't be misled by the orthopedic literature : tips for critical appraisal. Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Struijs PA; Bhandari M; International Evidence-Based Orthopedic Surgery Working Group Acta Orthop; 2007 Apr; 78(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 17464602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reporting of clinical trials: publication, authorship, and trial registration. Bonita RE; Adams S; Whellan DJ Heart Fail Clin; 2011 Oct; 7(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 21925440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome reporting bias in government-funded RCTs. Moja PL; Moschetti I; D'Amico R CMAJ; 2005 Mar; 172(7):857; author reply 857. PubMed ID: 15795393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias]. Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):670-6. PubMed ID: 23200211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Chan AW; Krleza-Jerić K; Schmid I; Altman DG CMAJ; 2004 Sep; 171(7):735-40. PubMed ID: 15451835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial. Emerson GB; Warme WJ; Wolf FM; Heckman JD; Brand RA; Leopold SS Arch Intern Med; 2010 Nov; 170(21):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21098355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Reverberations of the past or the pitfalls of statistical and data manipulation]. Martin-Du-Pan RC Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Jun; 7(299):1332-3. PubMed ID: 21793426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]