These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26635310)

  • 1. Performance differences when using 26- and 29-inch-wheel bikes in Swiss National Team cross-country mountain bikers.
    Steiner T; Müller B; Maier T; Wehrlin JP
    J Sports Sci; 2016 Aug; 34(15):1438-44. PubMed ID: 26635310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of mountain bike wheel size on cross-country performance.
    Hurst HT; Sinclair J; Atkins S; Rylands L; Metcalfe J
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Jul; 35(14):1349-1354. PubMed ID: 27477738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative vs. absolute physiological measures as predictors of mountain bike cross-country race performance.
    Gregory J; Johns DP; Walls JT
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Feb; 21(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 17313256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full suspension mountain bike improves off-road cycling performance.
    Nishii T; Umemura Y; Kitagawa K
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2004 Dec; 44(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 15758846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personal best time and training volume, not anthropometry, is related to race performance in the 'Swiss Bike Masters' mountain bike ultramarathon.
    Knechtle B; Knechtle P; Rosemann T; Senn O
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 May; 25(5):1312-7. PubMed ID: 21522074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of wheel size on muscle activity and tri-axial accelerations during cross-country mountain biking.
    Hurst HT; Sinclair J; Atkins S; Rylands L; Metcalfe J
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Jul; 35(14):1342-1348. PubMed ID: 27477671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical work and physiological responses to simulated cross country mountain bike racing.
    Macdermid PW; Stannard S
    J Sports Sci; 2012; 30(14):1491-501. PubMed ID: 22876780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of physiological responses and performance between mountain bicycles with differing suspension systems.
    Herrick JE; Flohr JA; Wenos DL; Saunders MJ
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2011 Dec; 6(4):546-58. PubMed ID: 22248554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between anaerobic cycling tests and mountain bike cross-country performance.
    Inoue A; Sá Filho AS; Mello FC; Santos TM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jun; 26(6):1589-93. PubMed ID: 21912290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power Output and Pacing During International Cross-Country Mountain Bike Cycling.
    Granier C; Abbiss CR; Aubry A; Vauchez Y; Dorel S; Hausswirth C; Le Meur Y
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2018 Oct; 13(9):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 29688109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of front and dual suspension mountain bike systems on uphill cycling performance.
    MacRae HS-H ; Hise KJ; Allen PJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jul; 32(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 10912893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of brake data acquired with a brake power meter during simulated cross-country mountain bike racing.
    Miller MC; Fink PW; Macdermid PW; Stannard SR
    Sports Biomech; 2019 Aug; 18(4):343-353. PubMed ID: 29343172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of mountain bike suspensions on vibrations and off-road uphill performance.
    Faiss R; Praz M; Meichtry A; Gobelet C; Deriaz O
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2007 Jun; 47(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 17557052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The age-related performance decline in ultraendurance mountain biking.
    Haupt S; Knechtle B; Knechtle P; Rüst CA; Rosemann T; Lepers R
    Res Sports Med; 2013; 21(2):146-58. PubMed ID: 23541101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of uphill cycling and bicycle suspension on downhill performance during cross-country mountain biking.
    Macdermid PW; Fink PW; Miller MC; Stannard S
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Jul; 35(14):1355-1363. PubMed ID: 27484102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of 26 versus 29-inch wheel diameter in the transmission of vibrations in cross-country mountain biking.
    Moreno Mañas E; Llana-Belloch S; Úbeda-Pastor V; Garcia-Massó X
    Sports Biomech; 2024 Oct; 23(10):1651-1662. PubMed ID: 34431449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlations between physiological variables and performance in high level cross country off road cyclists.
    Impellizzeri FM; Marcora SM; Rampinini E; Mognoni P; Sassi A
    Br J Sports Med; 2005 Oct; 39(10):747-51. PubMed ID: 16183772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physiological characteristics of successful mountain bikers and professional road cyclists.
    Lee H; Martin DT; Anson JM; Grundy D; Hahn AG
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1001-8. PubMed ID: 12477010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of performance in a 4-h mountain-bike race.
    Novak AR; Bennett KJM; Fransen J; Dascombe BJ
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Feb; 36(4):462-468. PubMed ID: 28406361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Field and laboratory correlates of performance in competitive cross-country mountain bikers.
    Prins L; Terblanche E; Myburgh KH
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Jun; 25(8):927-35. PubMed ID: 17474046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.