These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26635689)

  • 1. EEG can Track the Time Course of Successful Reference Resolution in Small Visual Worlds.
    Brodbeck C; Gwilliams L; Pylkkänen L
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1787. PubMed ID: 26635689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Language in context: Characterizing the comprehension of referential expressions with MEG.
    Brodbeck C; Pylkkänen L
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():447-460. PubMed ID: 27989776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online processing of sentences containing noun modification in young children with high-functioning autism.
    Bavin EL; Prendergast LA; Kidd E; Baker E; Dissanayake C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Mar; 51(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 26215207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of single-word and adjective-noun phrase production using event-related brain potentials.
    Lange VM; Perret C; Laganaro M
    Cortex; 2015 Jun; 67():15-29. PubMed ID: 25863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The lexical semantics of adjective-noun phrases in the human brain.
    Fyshe A; Sudre G; Wehbe L; Rafidi N; Mitchell TM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Oct; 40(15):4457-4469. PubMed ID: 31313467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What do you know? ERP evidence for immediate use of common ground during online reference resolution.
    Sikos L; Tomlinson SB; Heins C; Grodner DJ
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():275-285. PubMed ID: 30388433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs.
    Ferguson HJ; Cane JE
    Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 1622():252-69. PubMed ID: 26119912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitch accents in context: how listeners process accentuation in referential communication.
    Bögels S; Schriefers H; Vonk W; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2022-36. PubMed ID: 21458470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension.
    van Berkum JJ; Brown CM; Hagoort P; Zwitserlood P
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Mar; 40(2):235-48. PubMed ID: 12820864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anticipating information structure: An event-related potentials study of focus assignment via the it-cleft.
    Alemán Bañón J; Martin C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107203. PubMed ID: 31560886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scalar reference, contrast and discourse: Separating effects of linguistic discourse from availability of the referent.
    Wolter L; Gorman KS; Tanenhaus MK
    J Mem Lang; 2011 Oct; 65(3):299-317. PubMed ID: 21927536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple constraints on semantic integration in a hierarchical structure: ERP evidence from German.
    Zhang Y; Jiang X; Saalbach H; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1410():89-100. PubMed ID: 21803335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: evidence from eye tracking.
    Guerra E; Knoeferle P
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):535-52. PubMed ID: 25215930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year-olds can predict a noun based on an attributive adjective: evidence from eye-tracking.
    Tribushinina E; Mak WM
    J Child Lang; 2016 Mar; 43(2):425-441. PubMed ID: 25906767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients.
    Cohen L; Dehaene S; Naccache L; Lehéricy S; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Hénaff MA; Michel F
    Brain; 2000 Feb; 123 ( Pt 2)():291-307. PubMed ID: 10648437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does visual working memory represent the predicted locations of future target objects? An event-related brain potential study.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():258-66. PubMed ID: 25445999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast perception as a visual heuristic in the formulation of referential expressions.
    Long M; Moore I; Mollica F; Rubio-Fernandez P
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104879. PubMed ID: 34418775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robust index of lexical representation in the left occipito-temporal cortex as evidenced by EEG responses to fast periodic visual stimulation.
    Lochy A; Van Belle G; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 25448857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.