These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26636096)

  • 1. Estimating Measurement Error of the Patient Activation Measure for Respondents with Partially Missing Data.
    Linden A
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():270168. PubMed ID: 26636096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multilevel multidimensional item response model with a multilevel latent covariate.
    Cho SJ; Bottge B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):410-33. PubMed ID: 25817243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple imputation algorithm reduced missing data in SF-12 health surveys.
    Perneger TV; Burnand B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 58(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 15680747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missing data on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a comparison of 4 imputation techniques.
    Bono C; Ried LD; Kimberlin C; Vogel B
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Mar; 3(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 17350555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods.
    Shrive FM; Stuart H; Quan H; Ghali WA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Dec; 6():57. PubMed ID: 17166270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QALYs: incorporating the rate of change in quality of life.
    Katostaras T; Katostara N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 190():216-8. PubMed ID: 23823427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A doubly robust estimator for the average treatment effect in the context of a mean-reverting measurement error.
    Lenis D; Ebnesajjad CF; Stuart EA
    Biostatistics; 2017 Apr; 18(2):325-337. PubMed ID: 27993763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Over- and Underestimation of Success Rates].
    Höder J; Eisemann N; Hüppe A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jun; 77(6):426-31. PubMed ID: 25001904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.
    Groenwold RH; Donders AR; Roes KC; Harrell FE; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22262640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).
    Risk N
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 26784378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Including auxiliary item information in longitudinal data analyses improved handling missing questionnaire outcome data.
    Eekhout I; Enders CK; Twisk JW; de Boer MR; de Vet HC; Heymans MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 25724894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.
    Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Missing data and imputation: a practical illustration in a prognostic study on low back pain.
    Vergouw D; Heymans MW; van der Windt DA; Foster NE; Dunn KM; van der Horst HE; de Vet HC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):464-71. PubMed ID: 22964020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.
    Wang CY; Huang Y; Chao EC; Jeffcoat MK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 17608787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Devising a Missing Data Rule for a Quality of Life Questionnaire-A Simulation Study.
    Jacoby P; Whitehouse A; Leonard H; Saldaris J; Demarest S; Benke T; Downs J
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2022 Aug; 43(6):e414-e418. PubMed ID: 35075044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating range of influence in case of missing spatial data: a simulation study on binary data.
    Bihrmann K; Ersbøll AK
    Int J Health Geogr; 2015 Jan; 14():1. PubMed ID: 25563056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What are the appropriate methods for analyzing patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials when data are missing?
    Hamel JF; Sebille V; Le Neel T; Kubis G; Boyer FC; Hardouin JB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2897-2908. PubMed ID: 26546257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits of applying a proxy eligibility period when using electronic health records for outcomes research: a simulation study.
    Yu TC; Zhou H
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jun; 8():229. PubMed ID: 26055181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.