These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26638049)

  • 1. Simultaneous segmentation and generalisation of non-adjacent dependencies from continuous speech.
    Frost RL; Monaghan P
    Cognition; 2016 Feb; 147():70-4. PubMed ID: 26638049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sleep-Driven Computations in Speech Processing.
    Frost RL; Monaghan P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169538. PubMed ID: 28056104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-adjacent dependency learning in infancy, and its link to language development.
    Frost RLA; Jessop A; Durrant S; Peter MS; Bidgood A; Pine JM; Rowland CF; Monaghan P
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Aug; 120():101291. PubMed ID: 32197131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning to generalise but not segment an artificial language at 17 months predicts children's language skills 3 years later.
    Monaghan P; Donnelly S; Alcock K; Bidgood A; Cain K; Durrant S; Frost RLA; Jago LS; Peter MS; Pine JM; Turnbull H; Rowland CF
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Dec; 147():101607. PubMed ID: 37804784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Signal-driven computations in speech processing.
    Peña M; Bonatti LL; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):604-7. PubMed ID: 12202684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosodic cues enhance rule learning by changing speech segmentation mechanisms.
    de Diego-Balaguer R; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Bachoud-Lévi AC
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1478. PubMed ID: 26483731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid Statistical Learning Supporting Word Extraction From Continuous Speech.
    Batterink LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jul; 28(7):921-928. PubMed ID: 28493810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in non-adjacent statistical dependency learning in infants.
    Lany J; Shoaib A
    J Child Lang; 2020 Mar; 47(2):483-507. PubMed ID: 31190666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How many mechanisms are needed to analyze speech? A connectionist simulation of structural rule learning in artificial language acquisition.
    Laakso A; Calvo P
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(7):1243-81. PubMed ID: 21827532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The semantics-syntax interface: Learning grammatical categories and hierarchical syntactic structure through semantics.
    Poletiek FH; Monaghan P; van de Velde M; Bocanegra BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1141-1155. PubMed ID: 34694843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primitive computations in speech processing.
    Endress AD; Mehler J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2187-209. PubMed ID: 19418378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Co-occurrence statistics as a language-dependent cue for speech segmentation.
    Saksida A; Langus A; Nespor M
    Dev Sci; 2017 May; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 27146310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A joint model of word segmentation and meaning acquisition through cross-situational learning.
    Räsänen O; Rasilo H
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Oct; 122(4):792-829. PubMed ID: 26437151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral and Imaging Studies of Infant Artificial Grammar Learning.
    Gervain J; de la Cruz-Pavía I; Gerken L
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Jul; 12(3):815-827. PubMed ID: 30554481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Words, rules, and mechanisms of language acquisition.
    Endress AD; Bonatti LL
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2016; 7(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 26683248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word-form familiarity bootstraps infant speech segmentation.
    Altvater-Mackensen N; Mani N
    Dev Sci; 2013 Nov; 16(6):980-90. PubMed ID: 24118722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues.
    Endress AD; Hauser MD
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):177-99. PubMed ID: 20573342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit acquisition of grammars with crossed and nested non-adjacent dependencies: investigating the push-down stack model.
    Uddén J; Ingvar M; Hagoort P; Petersson KM
    Cogn Sci; 2012 Aug; 36(6):1078-101. PubMed ID: 22452530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mark my words: High frequency marker words impact early stages of language learning.
    Frost RLA; Monaghan P; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1883-1898. PubMed ID: 30652894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.