BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26639071)

  • 1. Assessing an adherent silicone foam dressing: a clinical evaluation across five NHS trusts.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Bethell E; Linthwaite A; Bullough L; Armstrong J
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Dec; 20 Suppl 12():S32-8. PubMed ID: 26639071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An observational evaluation of a new foam adhesive dressing.
    Merlin-Manton E; Greenwood M; Linthwaite A
    Br J Nurs; 2015 Aug 13-Sep 19; 24(15):S21-2, S24-7. PubMed ID: 26266560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical acceptability of a dressing with matrix technology: a multisite evaluation of acute and chronic wounds.
    Guthrie J; Potter R
    J Wound Care; 2016 Aug; 25(8):465-9. PubMed ID: 27523658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicentre clinical evaluation of Cuticell Contact silicone wound contact layer in daily practice.
    Suess-Burghart A; Zomer K; Schwanke D
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jun; Suppl Community Wound Care():S35-6, S38-41. PubMed ID: 26052993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a thin absorbent skin adhesive dressing for wound management.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Wibaux A; Johnson P; Carty N
    J Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 23(11):532, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 25375401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a superabsorbent wound dressing, patient and clinician perspective: a case series.
    Atkin L; Barrett S; Chadwick P; Callaghan R; Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Simm S
    J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):174-182. PubMed ID: 32160089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality improvement evaluation of postoperative wound dressings in orthopaedic patients.
    Pickles S; McAllister E; McCullagh G; Nieroba TJ
    Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs; 2022 May; 45():100922. PubMed ID: 35227950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a TLC-Ag dressing on 2270 patients with wounds at risk or with signs of local infection: an observational study.
    Dissemond J; Dietlein M; Neßeler I; Funke L; Scheuermann O; Becker E; Thomassin L; Möller U; Bohbot S; Münter KC
    J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):162-173. PubMed ID: 32160091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two silver dressings for wound management in pediatric burns.
    Jester I; Bohn I; Hannmann T; Waag KL; Loff S
    Wounds; 2008 Nov; 20(11):303-8. PubMed ID: 25941829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of a new, flexible lipidocolloid dressing on acute and chronic wounds: results of a clinical study.
    Meaume S; Perez J; Descamps H; Voinchet V; Jault P; Saunier V; Bohbot S
    J Wound Care; 2011 Apr; 20(4):180, 182-5. PubMed ID: 21537306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.
    Morris C; Emsley P; Marland E; Meuleneire F; White R
    Paediatr Nurs; 2009 Apr; 21(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 19397129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impregnated acetate gauze compared with lipido-colloid contact layer at dressing removal pain: a single-blind cross-over randomised control trial.
    Meaume S; Thomas P; Truchetet F; Celerier P; Becherel PA; Teot L; Bedane C
    J Wound Care; 2019 Feb; 28(2):89-101. PubMed ID: 30767647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment of 52 patients with a self-adhesive siliconised superabsorbent dressing: a multicentre observational study.
    Barrett S; Rippon M; Rogers AA
    J Wound Care; 2020 Jun; 29(6):340-349. PubMed ID: 32530782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing wound care with a new lipido-colloid dressing (Urgotul Duo).
    Meaume S; Ourabah Z; Charru P; Meyer P; Perez J; Sauvadet A; Bohbot S
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Mar 22-Apr 11; 16(6):S4, S6, S8 passim. PubMed ID: 17505400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open, non-comparative, multi-centre post clinical study of the performance and safety of a gelling fibre wound dressing on diabetic foot ulcers.
    Chadwick P; McCardle J
    J Wound Care; 2016 May; 25(5):290-300. PubMed ID: 27169344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A hydrocellular foam dressing versus gauze: effects on the healing of rat excisional wounds.
    Kunugiza Y; Tomita T; Moritomo H; Yoshikawa H
    J Wound Care; 2010 Jan; 19(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 20081568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical evaluation of Urgotul to treat acute and chronic wounds.
    Benbow M; Iosson G
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Jan 22-Feb 11; 13(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 14997068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a foam dressing for acute and chronic wound exudate management.
    Bullough L; Johnson S; Forder R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Sep; Suppl Wound Care():S17-8, S20, S22-4. PubMed ID: 26322401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance and ease of use evaluation of a new surgical post-operative foam island dressing in 14 patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgery.
    Gibson E; Stephens C
    J Tissue Viability; 2013 May; 22(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 23558294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Role of a Silver Releasing Lipido-colloid Contact Layer in Venous Leg Ulcers Presenting Inflammatory Signs Suggesting Heavy Bacterial Colonization: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.
    Lazareth I; Meaume S; Sigal-Grinberg ML; Combemale P; Guyadec TL; Zagnoli A; Perrot JL; Sauvadet A; Bohbot S
    Wounds; 2008 Jun; 20(6):158-66. PubMed ID: 25942521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.