144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26639410)
1. Cloud-based decision framework for waste-to-energy plant site selection - A case study from China.
Wu Y; Chen K; Zeng B; Yang M; Geng S
Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():593-603. PubMed ID: 26639410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-criteria decision-making on assessment of proposed tidal barrage schemes in terms of environmental impacts.
Wu Y; Xu C; Ke Y; Chen K; Xu H
Mar Pollut Bull; 2017 Dec; 125(1-2):271-281. PubMed ID: 28844777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties.
Guo P; Huang GH
Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 19854040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a fuzzy decision support system to determine the location of a landfill site.
Alves MC; Lima BS; Evsukoff AG; Vieira IN
Waste Manag Res; 2009 Oct; 27(7):641-51. PubMed ID: 19470537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multi-attribute decision-making-based site selection assessment algorithm for garbage disposal plant using interval q-rung orthopair fuzzy power Muirhead mean operator.
Yang Z; Chang J
Environ Res; 2021 Feb; 193():110385. PubMed ID: 33166534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision-theoretic rough set model and spatial analysis-based waste-to-energy incineration plant site selection: a case study in first-tier cities of China.
Zhang X; Kang J; Che Y; Cao X; Li P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(54):115699-115720. PubMed ID: 37889411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An integrated decision making approach for assessing healthcare waste treatment technologies from a multiple stakeholder.
Shi H; Liu HC; Li P; Xu XG
Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():508-517. PubMed ID: 27866995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study.
Afrane S; Ampah JD; Agyekum EB; Amoh PO; Yusuf AA; Fattah IMR; Agbozo E; Elgamli E; Shouran M; Mao G; Kamel S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. IFRP: a hybrid interval-parameter fuzzy robust programming approach for waste management planning under uncertainty.
Nie XH; Huang GH; Li YP; Liu L
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16854517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applying Fuzzy logic and the point count system to select landfill sites.
Ojha CS; Goyal MK; Kumar S
Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Dec; 135(1-3):99-106. PubMed ID: 17564807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A fuzzy evaluation and selection of construction and demolition waste utilization modes in Xi'an, China.
Zhang F; Ju Y; Dong P; Santibanez Gonzalez ED
Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jul; 38(7):792-801. PubMed ID: 32160832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-stage optimal site selection for waste-to-energy plant using single-valued neutrosophic sets and geographic information system based multi-criteria decision-making approach: A case study of Beijing, China.
Meng Q; Pang N; Zhao S; Gao J
Waste Manag; 2023 Feb; 156():283-296. PubMed ID: 36195505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Waste-to-energy incineration site selection framework based on heterogeneous fuzzy regret-PROMETHEE model considering life-cycle carbon emissions.
Guo F; Men H; Chen W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(3):3722-3744. PubMed ID: 38091218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Entropy and discrimination measures based q-rung orthopair fuzzy MULTIMOORA framework for selecting solid waste disposal method.
Mishra AR; Rani P; Pamucar D; Hezam IM; Saha A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(5):12988-13011. PubMed ID: 36121629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hazardous Waste Disposal Enterprise Selection in China Using Hesitant Fuzzy PROMETHEE.
Liang X; Miao J; Li Y; Yang X; Li Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32560196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterizing effects of uncertainties in MSW composting process through a coupled fuzzy vertex and factorial-analysis approach.
Xi BD; Qin XS; Su XK; Jiang YH; Wei ZM
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1609-23. PubMed ID: 17950590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SLFP: a stochastic linear fractional programming approach for sustainable waste management.
Zhu H; Huang GH
Waste Manag; 2011 Dec; 31(12):2612-9. PubMed ID: 21908182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China.
Wang G; Qin L; Li G; Chen L
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2414-21. PubMed ID: 19375842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Land suitability for waste disposal in metropolitan areas.
Baiocchi V; Lelo K; Polettini A; Pomi R
Waste Manag Res; 2014 Aug; 32(8):707-16. PubMed ID: 25161275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
