These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26640307)

  • 1. Resolving Contested Elections: The Limited Power of Post-Vote Vote-Choice Data.
    Glynn AN; Richardson TS; Handcock MS
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2010; 105(489):84-91. PubMed ID: 26640307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The downstream consequences of long waits: How lines at the precinct depress future turnout.
    Pettigrew S
    Elect Stud; 2021 Jun; 71():102188. PubMed ID: 32839636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How a minority can win: Unrepresentative outcomes in a simple model of voter turnout.
    Landgren E; Juul JL; Strogatz SH
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Nov; 104(5-1):054307. PubMed ID: 34942728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving Predictive Accuracy in Elections.
    Sathiaraj D; Cassidy WM; Rohli E
    Big Data; 2017 Dec; 5(4):325-336. PubMed ID: 29235914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should I vote-by-mail or in person? The impact of COVID-19 risk factors and partisanship on vote mode decisions in the 2020 presidential election.
    Atkeson LR; Hansen WL; Oliver MT; Maestas CD; Wiemer EC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274357. PubMed ID: 36107938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are We Rational or Not? The Exploration of Voter Choices during the 2016 Presidential and Legislative Elections in Taiwan.
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Yen NS; Tsai CH; Cheng HP
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1762. PubMed ID: 29075215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing for voter rigging in small polling stations.
    Jimenez R; Hidalgo M; Klimek P
    Sci Adv; 2017 Jun; 3(6):e1602363. PubMed ID: 28695193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Closest to the People? Incumbency Advantage and the Personal Vote in Non-Partisan Elections.
    Lucas J; McGregor RM; Tuxhorn KL
    Polit Res Q; 2022 Mar; 75(1):188-202. PubMed ID: 35185309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Waiting to vote safely: How Covid-19 safety measures shaped in-person voter wait times during the 2020 election.
    Coll J
    Soc Sci Q; 2022 Mar; 103(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 35602178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share.
    Thompson DM; Wu JA; Yoder J; Hall AB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(25):14052-14056. PubMed ID: 32518108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voter model on networks and the multivariate beta distribution.
    Mori S; Hisakado M; Nakayama K
    Phys Rev E; 2019 May; 99(5-1):052307. PubMed ID: 31212470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The participatory and partisan impacts of mandatory vote-by-mail.
    Barber M; Holbein JB
    Sci Adv; 2020 Aug; 6(35):eabc7685. PubMed ID: 32923653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
    Curtis LH; Hoffman MN; Califf RM; Hammill BG
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Sep; 15():100840. PubMed ID: 34169139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Elicited Choice Probabilities in Hypothetical Elections to Study Decisions to Vote.
    Delavande A; Manski CF
    Elect Stud; 2015 Jun; 38():28-37. PubMed ID: 25705068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017-2018.
    Klimek P; Jiménez R; Hidalgo M; Hinteregger A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204975. PubMed ID: 30289899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Not by turnout alone: Measuring the sources of electoral change, 2012 to 2016.
    Hill SJ; Hopkins DJ; Huber GA
    Sci Adv; 2021 Apr; 7(17):. PubMed ID: 33883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.
    Gao M; Wang Z; Wang K; Liu C; Tang S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270194. PubMed ID: 35771877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health care in the 2004 presidential election.
    Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1314-22. PubMed ID: 15385658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.