139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2664041)
1. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
Yamamoto K; Kitao M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT of the normal and abnormal parametria in cervical cancer.
Vick CW; Walsh JW; Wheelock JB; Brewer WH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Sep; 143(3):597-603. PubMed ID: 6331741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parametrial invasion of uterine cervical cancer assessed by transrectal ultrasonography: preliminary report.
Aoki S; Hata T; Senoh D; Makihara K; Hata K; Takamiya O; Kitao M
Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Jan; 36(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 2403960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of fine needle aspiration biopsy and sonographic evaluation of parametria in cervical cancer.
Cendrowski K; Sawicki W; Spiewankiewiez B; Stelmachów J
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 14584659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical stage I carcinoma of the cervix. Value of MR imaging in determining invasion into the parametrium.
Lien HH; Blomlie V; Iversen T; Tropé C; Sundfør K; Abeler VM
Acta Radiol; 1993 Mar; 34(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 8452717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in cervical cancer].
Cendrowski K; Sawicki W; Wygledowski J; Spiewankiewicz B; Stelmachów J
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):683-8. PubMed ID: 14674108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P
Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
Poon PY
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of transrectal radial scan ultrasonography in evaluating the extent of uterine cervical cancer.
Yuhara A; Akamatsu N; Sekiba K
J Clin Ultrasound; 1987 Oct; 15(8):507-17. PubMed ID: 3134457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods and characteristics of patients operated on for cervical cancer in Lithuania, 1998-2000].
el-Aawar B
Medicina (Kaunas); 2002; 38(6):597-610. PubMed ID: 12474666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early-stage cervical cancer: agreement between ultrasound and histopathological findings with regard to tumor size and extent of local disease.
Gaurilcikas A; Vaitkiene D; Cizauskas A; Inciura A; Svedas E; Maciuleviciene R; Di Legge A; Ferrandina G; Testa AC; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):707-15. PubMed ID: 21538643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: role of short tau inversion recovery sequence.
Lam WW; So NM; Yang WT; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2000 Sep; 55(9):702-7. PubMed ID: 10988049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Experience with the combined diagnosis and therapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage FIGO IIB-III). Transrectal ultrasonography and CT in the staging and in follow-up after therapy. Preliminary results].
Marano P; Summaria V; Smaniotto D; Danza FM; Speca S; Valentini AL; Greggi S; Lancia M; Cellini N
Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 8272550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Computerized tomography staging of carcinomas of the uterus].
Bautz W; Merl T; Kersting-Sommerhoff B
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):370-6. PubMed ID: 7938484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Marincek B; Devaud MC; Triller J; Fuchs WA
Eur J Radiol; 1984 May; 4(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6734609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma.
Walsh JW; Goplerud DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
